Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

he won't b/c even the founders' interpretation which does

Posted on: December 4, 2019 at 16:50:05 CT
blake1771 MU
Posts:
14360
Member For:
19.90 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
not significantly differ from our modern statute isn't violated by Trump's actions. and that is of course just assuming that there is no disagreement on what the founders' definition was in the first place; which is not the case at all.

replying with "English common law" doesn't cut it for the purposes of this debate.

Edited by blake1771 at 16:50:55 on 12/04/19
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Ouch Don, Ouch - raskolnikov MU - 12/4 15:51:31
     RE: Ouch Don, Ouch - Emoji Man MSU - 12/4 17:12:22
     RE: Ouch Don, Ouch - MOCO SON MU - 12/4 16:38:01
     You just continue to demonstrate - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 12/4 16:17:34
          RE: You just continue to demonstrate - scan MU - 12/4 18:04:12
          Dumber than a rock and proud of it - mu7176grad MU - 12/4 16:36:41
               wew lad(nm) - Role Call MU - 12/4 17:13:50
     RE: Ouch Don: Are you aware this is the opinion of a rabid - BH O'bonga MU - 12/4 16:08:18
          Law Review has an editor not a president, brainiac(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 12/4 16:21:34
          C’mon now, raskputin probably knows someone who knows - hokie VT - 12/4 16:16:48
     And the factual basis along with supporting evidence is? (nm) - MIZ45 MU - 12/4 16:01:53
     the same guy who thinks Trump should be impeached over - blake1771 MU - 12/4 16:00:42
          but Rask says he is smart, so there! - Spanky KU - 12/4 16:08:07
     Actually there is a distinction. Hop a fence to get on to a - TigerMatt STL - 12/4 15:59:15
          there is no distinction with bribery - ashtray UF - 12/4 16:00:14
               Except none of the elements of bribery are in play - Spanky KU - 12/4 16:09:53
                    what do you think those elements are? (nm) - ashtray UF - 12/4 16:20:03
                         Cite the bribery law you think was violated - Spanky KU - 12/4 16:28:39
                              he won't b/c even the founders' interpretation which does - blake1771 MU - 12/4 16:50:05
                              english common law (nm) - ashtray UF - 12/4 16:40:09
                                   LMAO way to just deflect because you don't know - Calca STL - 12/4 18:18:51
                                        Exactly, moron - ashtray UF - 12/4 18:27:17
                                             You really are a stupid idiot - Calca STL - 12/4 18:43:58
                                                  you're projecting (nm) - ashtray UF - 12/4 19:03:24
               true. too bad for you there was neither in this case. - blake1771 MU - 12/4 16:07:58
                    you're referencing federal statute - ashtray UF - 12/4 16:18:26
                         why don't you link the founder's opinon of what constituted - blake1771 MU - 12/4 16:25:50
                              RE: why don't you link the founder's opinon of what constituted - ashtray UF - 12/4 16:39:13
                                   the article you linked does not address the founder's - blake1771 MU - 12/4 16:46:14
               But there was no bribe. Case closed. (nm) - Logan BAMA - 12/4 16:02:59
                    it's clearly obvious that there was (nm) - ashtray UF - 12/4 16:04:16
                         Is that your opinion? (nm) - Logan BAMA - 12/4 16:15:49
                              of course it's my opinion - ashtray UF - 12/4 16:19:06
                                   Then it's not a fact. (nm) - Logan BAMA - 12/4 16:42:48
                                        I didn't claim it was - ashtray UF - 12/4 16:43:18
                                             That's your opinion. I beg to differ. - Logan BAMA - 12/4 16:58:29
                         you don't know the elements of the crime of bribery. that - blake1771 MU - 12/4 16:08:36
                              you don't understand or appreciate the Constitution. that - ashtray UF - 12/4 16:19:41
                                   you made the claim that bribery as perceived by the founders - blake1771 MU - 12/4 16:28:51
                                        english common law - ashtray UF - 12/4 16:39:53
                                             so link the founders' definition of bribery. from any source - blake1771 MU - 12/4 16:47:56
                                                  If I have to spoonfeed your ignorant ass... - ashtray UF - 12/4 17:36:49
                                                       Military Aid was not withheld. thanks. agrument over. - blake1771 MU - 12/4 21:49:10
                                                       Translation: You have no idea - Calca STL - 12/4 18:44:54
                                                            nice lay down (nm) - ashtray UF - 12/4 19:03:02
     The intellectual class has always been part of - Newcatbirdseat MU - 12/4 15:56:50
     There is a distinction...it's his opinion - Logan BAMA - 12/4 15:56:49
     RE: Ouch Don, Ouch - MizzouTigerz MU - 12/4 15:54:29




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard