Welcome Guest

you're referencing federal statute

Posted on: December 4, 2019 at 16:18:26 CT

ashtray UF

Posts:

111045

Member For:

22.50 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

which I already told you didn't matter.

The founders had a broader conception of bribery than what's in current statute.

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

Ouch Don, Ouch - raskolnikov MU - 12/4 15:51:31

RE: Ouch Don, Ouch - Emoji Man MSU - 12/4 17:12:22

RE: Ouch Don, Ouch - MOCO SON MU - 12/4 16:38:01

You just continue to demonstrate - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 12/4 16:17:34

RE: You just continue to demonstrate - scan MU - 12/4 18:04:12

Dumber than a rock and proud of it - mu7176grad MU - 12/4 16:36:41

wew lad(nm) - Role Call MU - 12/4 17:13:50

RE: Ouch Don: Are you aware this is the opinion of a rabid - BH O'bonga MU - 12/4 16:08:18

Law Review has an editor not a president, brainiac(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 12/4 16:21:34

C’mon now, raskputin probably knows someone who knows - hokie VT - 12/4 16:16:48

And the factual basis along with supporting evidence is? (nm) - MIZ45 MU - 12/4 16:01:53

the same guy who thinks Trump should be impeached over - blake1771 MU - 12/4 16:00:42

but Rask says he is smart, so there! - Spanky KU - 12/4 16:08:07

Actually there is a distinction. Hop a fence to get on to a - TigerMatt STL - 12/4 15:59:15

there is no distinction with bribery - ashtray UF - 12/4 16:00:14

Except none of the elements of bribery are in play - Spanky KU - 12/4 16:09:53

what do you think those elements are? (nm) - ashtray UF - 12/4 16:20:03

Cite the bribery law you think was violated - Spanky KU - 12/4 16:28:39

he won't b/c even the founders' interpretation which does - blake1771 MU - 12/4 16:50:05

english common law (nm) - ashtray UF - 12/4 16:40:09

LMAO way to just deflect because you don't know - Calca STL - 12/4 18:18:51

Exactly, moron - ashtray UF - 12/4 18:27:17

You really are a stupid idiot - Calca STL - 12/4 18:43:58

you're projecting (nm) - ashtray UF - 12/4 19:03:24

true. too bad for you there was neither in this case. - blake1771 MU - 12/4 16:07:58

you're referencing federal statute - ashtray UF - 12/4 16:18:26

why don't you link the founder's opinon of what constituted - blake1771 MU - 12/4 16:25:50

RE: why don't you link the founder's opinon of what constituted - ashtray UF - 12/4 16:39:13

the article you linked does not address the founder's - blake1771 MU - 12/4 16:46:14

But there was no bribe. Case closed. (nm) - Logan BAMA - 12/4 16:02:59

it's clearly obvious that there was (nm) - ashtray UF - 12/4 16:04:16

Is that your opinion? (nm) - Logan BAMA - 12/4 16:15:49

of course it's my opinion - ashtray UF - 12/4 16:19:06

Then it's not a fact. (nm) - Logan BAMA - 12/4 16:42:48

I didn't claim it was - ashtray UF - 12/4 16:43:18

That's your opinion. I beg to differ. - Logan BAMA - 12/4 16:58:29

you don't know the elements of the crime of bribery. that - blake1771 MU - 12/4 16:08:36

you don't understand or appreciate the Constitution. that - ashtray UF - 12/4 16:19:41

you made the claim that bribery as perceived by the founders - blake1771 MU - 12/4 16:28:51

english common law - ashtray UF - 12/4 16:39:53

so link the founders' definition of bribery. from any source - blake1771 MU - 12/4 16:47:56

If I have to spoonfeed your ignorant ass... - ashtray UF - 12/4 17:36:49

Military Aid was not withheld. thanks. agrument over. - blake1771 MU - 12/4 21:49:10

Translation: You have no idea - Calca STL - 12/4 18:44:54

nice lay down (nm) - ashtray UF - 12/4 19:03:02

The intellectual class has always been part of - Newcatbirdseat MU - 12/4 15:56:50

There is a distinction...it's his opinion - Logan BAMA - 12/4 15:56:49

RE: Ouch Don, Ouch - MizzouTigerz MU

- 12/4 15:54:29