Welcome Guest

RE: Nor did ANYONE claim he had already been indicted

Posted on: September 13, 2019 at 14:20:18 CT

Ace UNC

Posts:

29225

Member For:

6.18 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

When you were certain he WILL BE, were you aware the GJ did not recommend indictment?

In a non-political situation, no attorney would then turn around and recommend indictment/charges.

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

Spankee: they can’t back down now - Ace UNC - 9/13 14:01:43

so you admit that I am correct and McCabe will be indicted? - Spanky KU - 9/13 14:09:05

I DGAF what you said. I said the GJ did not indict. If DOJ - Ace UNC - 9/13 14:13:04

the DoJ doesn't indict anyone you idiot. - blake1771 KC - 9/13 15:51:55

Nor did ANYONE claim he had already been indicted - Spanky KU - 9/13 14:15:10

RE: Nor did ANYONE claim he had already been indicted - Ace UNC - 9/13 14:20:18

you're posting speculation as fact. there is nothing to - blake1771 KC - 9/13 15:54:29

There has been no Grand Jury yet, dumb@$$! - Spanky KU - 9/13 14:54:58

👀 - Ace UNC - 9/13 15:00:42

Your link was to a letter from the defense attorneys in - DHighlander NWMSU - 9/13 15:12:52

RE: Your link was to a letter from the defense attorneys in - Ace UNC - 9/13 15:22:28

'as prosecutors appeared close to charging him' - Spanky KU - 9/13 15:29:32

“To be charged” - Ace UNC - 9/13 15:35:59

this is one of the more bizarre arguments i've ever seen. - blake1771 KC - 9/13 15:57:48

and McCabe will be charged/indicted. - Spanky KU - 9/13 15:47:35

I dont doubt it, but it would be a political move - Ace UNC - 9/13 15:56:13

How is it different than Flynn or Popodopolus' charges? - Spanky KU - 9/13 16:32:57

apparently? you don't know that. - blake1771 KC - 9/13 16:02:14

Can you actually identify any strong suits of his?(nm) - DHighlander NWMSU - 9/13 15:32:53

He is strongly ignorant - Spanky KU - 9/13 15:52:29

Who is “they”? (nm) - Sal CMSU - 9/13 14:02:40