 |
|
Hey dumbazz.. I cited 2016 research newer than your 2012
Posted on: May 29, 2019 at 18:03:40 CT
TigerMatt STL
Posts:
99521
Member For:
26.62 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
12
NYT article.
"Our analysis estimates that the drug's ovulatory inhibition potential could prevent less than 15 percent of potential conceptions, thus making a pre-fertilization mechanism of action significantly less likely than previously thought. Luteal effects (such as decreased progesterone, altered glycodelin levels, and shortened luteal phase) present in the literature may suggest a pre-ovulatory induced post-fertilization drug effect.
Our findings confirm and extend earlier reviews of the topic suggesting that post-fertilization MOA of LNG-EC play a not negligible and possibly dominant role
Edited by TigerMatt at 18:06:07 on 05/29/19
"Our analysis estimates that the drug's ovulatory inhibition potential could prevent less than 15 percent of potential conceptions, thus making a pre-fertilization mechanism of action significantly less likely than previously thought. Luteal effects (such as decreased progesterone, altered glycodelin levels, and shortened luteal phase) present in the literature may suggest a pre-ovulatory induced post-fertilization drug effect.
Our findings confirm and extend earlier reviews of the topic suggesting that post-fertilization MOA of LNG-EC play a not negligible and possibly dominant role
Edited by TigerMatt at 18:06:07 on 05/29/19
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
- 
Hey dumbazz.. I cited 2016 research newer than your 2012 - TigerMatt STL - 5/29 18:03:40