Welcome Guest

Supreme Court hearings had been 60 votes, changed now

Posted on: September 4, 2018 at 09:51:25 CT

raskolnikov MU

Posts:

188057

Member For:

24.78 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

to simple majority. A guy like Kavanaugh could never get 60 votes.

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

The Kavanaugh hearing is the dems literally yelling - mu7176grad MU - 9/4 08:40:14

Do you ever turn the television off ? - raskolnikov MU - 9/4 09:00:44

TV on in the office in the background - mu7176grad MU - 9/4 09:38:33

lol (nm) - Sal KC - 9/4 09:05:07

Why is Cavanaugh needed to be there to witness this garbage. - hokie VT - 9/4 08:47:26

Street theater - mu7176grad MU - 9/4 08:58:14

you think this is any different from 250 years ago?? - pickle MU

- 9/4 08:45:30

Yes, 250 years ago you could challenge asswipes like Schumer - DoltfromSTL MU - 9/4 09:05:24

* - DC Jayhawk KU - 9/4 09:19:32

RE: you think this is any different from 250 years ago?? - cnk ATL - 9/4 08:50:20

Wow (nm) - pickle MU

- 9/4 10:04:14

Taking after Britain’s Parliment - Silas MU - 9/4 08:48:51

Yeah the kicking and screaming really started - MrBlueSky MU - 9/4 08:42:27

This is the big hit that Democrats and Liberals feared - raskolnikov MU - 9/4 09:07:14

What rules did the GOP change? (nm) - Sal KC - 9/4 09:10:40

Supreme Court hearings had been 60 votes, changed now - raskolnikov MU - 9/4 09:51:25

As to Roe v Wade ask during the hearing - mu7176grad MU - 9/4 08:56:29

People aren't allowed to change their views - Sal KC - 9/4 08:58:01

Not if they're liberals - MrBlueSky MU - 9/4 08:59:28

Fine --use it against Kavanaugh and indict him for lying - mu7176grad MU - 9/4 09:06:37

That isn't reserved just for liberals - Sal KC - 9/4 09:00:22

Clinton committed perjury (nm) - Sal KC - 9/4 08:50:47

No, he specifically said a president could be removed - MrBlueSky MU - 9/4 08:51:26

What's wrong with that statement? (nm) - Sal KC - 9/4 08:52:38

Does he apply the same standard to the current POTUS?(nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 9/4 08:55:09

I have no idea, do you? (nm) - Sal KC - 9/4 08:57:36

Of course he doesn't (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 9/4 08:58:41

Do you have a specific statement from him - Sal KC - 9/4 08:59:46

There are many, yes. A speech in 2017, for example - MrBlueSky MU - 9/4 09:11:07

And that is an example - Sal KC - 9/4 09:14:10

Sorry, Roe v Wade, rather (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 9/4 09:37:52

I see you've got your talking points emailed to you (nm) - Sal KC - 9/4 08:49:31

More documents than for all other SC nominees combined - mu7176grad MU - 9/4 08:45:30

The document argument with Kavanaugh is dumb as hell (nm) - Sal KC - 9/4 08:49:48

Majority of those documents were duplicate - MrBlueSky MU - 9/4 08:47:28