Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

More documents than for all other SC nominees combined

Posted on: September 4, 2018 at 08:45:30 CT
mu7176grad MU
Posts:
60575
Member For:
21.96 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
I think because of Garland the SCOTUS should be disbanded and everything turned over the Ruth Bader Ginsburg to be decided. Her and Cory Booker if she is passed out as usual

The dems just need to vote "no" forever I guess

Edited by mu7176grad at 08:46:02 on 09/04/18
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

The Kavanaugh hearing is the dems literally yelling - mu7176grad MU - 9/4 08:40:14
     Do you ever turn the television off ? - raskolnikov MU - 9/4 09:00:44
          TV on in the office in the background - mu7176grad MU - 9/4 09:38:33
          lol (nm) - Sal KC - 9/4 09:05:07
     Why is Cavanaugh needed to be there to witness this garbage. - hokie VT - 9/4 08:47:26
          Street theater - mu7176grad MU - 9/4 08:58:14
     you think this is any different from 250 years ago?? - pickle MU - 9/4 08:45:30
          Yes, 250 years ago you could challenge asswipes like Schumer - DoltfromSTL MU - 9/4 09:05:24
               * - DC Jayhawk KU - 9/4 09:19:32
          RE: you think this is any different from 250 years ago?? - cnk ATL - 9/4 08:50:20
               Wow (nm) - pickle MU - 9/4 10:04:14
          Taking after Britain’s Parliment - Silas MU - 9/4 08:48:51
     Yeah the kicking and screaming really started - MrBlueSky MU - 9/4 08:42:27
          This is the big hit that Democrats and Liberals feared - raskolnikov MU - 9/4 09:07:14
               What rules did the GOP change? (nm) - Sal KC - 9/4 09:10:40
                    Supreme Court hearings had been 60 votes, changed now - raskolnikov MU - 9/4 09:51:25
          As to Roe v Wade ask during the hearing - mu7176grad MU - 9/4 08:56:29
               People aren't allowed to change their views - Sal KC - 9/4 08:58:01
                    Not if they're liberals - MrBlueSky MU - 9/4 08:59:28
                         Fine --use it against Kavanaugh and indict him for lying - mu7176grad MU - 9/4 09:06:37
                         That isn't reserved just for liberals - Sal KC - 9/4 09:00:22
          Clinton committed perjury (nm) - Sal KC - 9/4 08:50:47
               No, he specifically said a president could be removed - MrBlueSky MU - 9/4 08:51:26
                    What's wrong with that statement? (nm) - Sal KC - 9/4 08:52:38
                         Does he apply the same standard to the current POTUS?(nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 9/4 08:55:09
                              I have no idea, do you? (nm) - Sal KC - 9/4 08:57:36
                                   Of course he doesn't (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 9/4 08:58:41
                                        Do you have a specific statement from him - Sal KC - 9/4 08:59:46
                                             There are many, yes. A speech in 2017, for example - MrBlueSky MU - 9/4 09:11:07
                                                  And that is an example - Sal KC - 9/4 09:14:10
                                                       Sorry, Roe v Wade, rather (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 9/4 09:37:52
          I see you've got your talking points emailed to you (nm) - Sal KC - 9/4 08:49:31
          More documents than for all other SC nominees combined - mu7176grad MU - 9/4 08:45:30
               The document argument with Kavanaugh is dumb as hell (nm) - Sal KC - 9/4 08:49:48
               Majority of those documents were duplicate - MrBlueSky MU - 9/4 08:47:28




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard