Welcome Guest

That's complete bs - an opinion piece by partisan hacks

Posted on: January 5, 2018 at 17:06:55 CT

tigerdb MU

Posts:

58182

Member For:

24.35 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

There has been no indication that the steele dossier was the basis for warrants.

If in fact information in that report was verified and became content used in obtaining the warrant, it's a non-issue.

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

Conservative Republicans initially hired Fusion GPS - Gadfly MU - 1/5 15:46:10

I don't get the pubs obsession with Steele/Fusion - Knucklehead MU - 1/5 16:29:55

It all boils down to whether the FISA warrant was valid. - JeffB MU

- 1/5 16:51:51

That's complete bs - an opinion piece by partisan hacks - tigerdb MU - 1/5 17:06:55

Why were the mainstream news sources, with alleged - JeffB MU

- 1/5 18:37:47

that author has no idea how the FISA warrant was obtained - Gadfly MU - 1/5 17:02:53

No, and neither does the NYT or you. They do have facts - JeffB MU

- 1/5 18:39:55

NYT misleading to the point of being false.. Your post - Spanky KU - 1/5 16:03:35

that's what they claim - Gadfly MU - 1/5 16:10:47

The Free Beacon had ZERO association with the Steele - Spanky KU - 1/5 16:14:26

but what started Mueller's investigation was the Australian - Gadfly MU - 1/5 16:16:22

All of the original reports about the investigation claimed - JeffB MU

- 1/5 17:11:21

That's a laugh! - Alferd Packer MU

- 1/5 16:25:43

LOL - do you have a link for your made-up ****? - tigerdb MU - 1/5 16:51:53

Says who? - Spanky KU - 1/5 16:24:16

you are working hard on that beach - Gadfly MU - 1/5 16:28:36

And you just started dancing like Yahoo George - Spanky KU - 1/5 16:36:55

your Fox News fake Dossier Narrative - Gadfly MU - 1/5 16:52:24

The FBI (that you place your trust in) said they could not - Spanky KU - 1/5 17:10:36

Probably true - they just wanted surface stuff...obviously - tigerdb MU - 1/5 16:13:48

nothing wrong with that - Gadfly MU - 1/5 16:16:59

So your saying the Ruskees interfered in the Republican - MIZZOUowns SEC - 1/5 16:00:22

they definitely interfered in the election - Gadfly MU - 1/5 16:05:01

No "public information" - Alferd Packer MU

- 1/5 16:15:27

the CIA has asserted that Russia interfered - Gadfly MU - 1/5 16:18:31

So? Did they have the permission of the original funder to - JeffB MU

- 1/5 15:50:26

Steele has more credibility than anyone in the Trump Admin - Gadfly MU - 1/5 15:51:37

That's debatable @ best, but not the criteria needed anyway(nm) - JeffB MU

- 1/5 15:54:10

criteria for what? - Gadfly MU - 1/5 15:54:38

For whether or not the dossier's contents prove a - JeffB MU

- 1/5 16:00:20

the Australian referral re Popadopolous' statements - Gadfly MU - 1/5 16:02:45

That narrative doesn't make much sense given the - JeffB MU

- 1/5 16:24:06

of course the hacking occurred before Pop's leak - Gadfly MU - 1/5 16:58:15

Isn't this old news? - tigerdb MU - 1/5 15:50:24

Russians interfered in our entire election - Gadfly MU - 1/5 15:52:27

By doing what? You remain a clueless idiot.(nm) - GA Tiger MU - 1/5 16:09:30

hacking into DNC servers - Gadfly MU - 1/5 16:11:22

Those servers were hacked BEFORE Papadopolous. (nm) - JeffB MU

- 1/5 16:29:59

that proves nothing - Gadfly MU - 1/5 16:53:04

Did you read the article? (nm) - JeffB MU

- 1/5 16:54:35

the fact that the servers were hacked before Pop - Gadfly MU - 1/5 17:07:26

Papadopoulis claimed the person purporting to be a Russian - JeffB MU

- 1/5 20:11:03

From what I read the mainstream media pulling for the - JeffB MU

- 1/5 15:52:05

is there a crime in that unverifiable assertion? - Gadfly MU - 1/5 15:53:43

No, I don't believe so. Nor is there a Trump crime if Russia - JeffB MU

- 1/5 15:58:13

money laundering is a crime - Gadfly MU - 1/5 16:00:39

Conspiracy is a crime, collusion per se is not. Depends upon - JeffB MU

- 1/5 16:06:25

Mueller knows all of this, but Fox News has troubles with it - Gadfly MU - 1/5 16:08:14