Welcome Guest

no, who mentioned govt lien? (nm)

Posted on: September 5, 2017 at 12:24:59 CT
90Tiger STL
Posts:
160804
Member For:
23.21 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
(nm) means no message
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

SIAP: Get government out of flood insurance! - Hbombtiger STL - 9/5 10:46:18
     Let's get rid of gvmt, period (nm) - pickle MU - 9/5 11:57:49
          We could if Ins companies acted the way they are supposed to - Badird MU - 9/5 11:56:53
               Easy. Make insurance policy cover you and not the other - tman KC - 9/5 12:28:34
                    It would sure matter to the insurance company. - Badird MU - 9/5 12:32:27
                         Because there is money to be made - tman KC - 9/5 12:42:17
                              Pure fantasy, im afraid. - Badird MU - 9/5 12:46:42
                                   No it makes you responsible for yourself. What you want is - tman KC - 9/5 12:49:55
                                        No. I am simply pointing out how dumb your system is. - Badird MU - 9/5 13:17:14
                                             No. You are just making a fool of yourself - tman KC - 9/5 13:27:53
                                                  No, its a fantasy. No Ins company will pay for things they - Badird MU - 9/5 14:27:05
               with a wage lien on the guy. you haven't "fixed" the proble - 90Tiger MU - 9/5 12:03:30
                    So you want the govt to apply a wage lien on whoever doesnt - Badird MU - 9/5 12:04:59
                         no, who mentioned govt lien? (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 9/5 12:24:59
               Its easy. You pull their plate when they dont have insurance - NWMizzouFan MU - 9/5 11:58:16
                    *facepalm* You didnt answer my question at all... - Badird MU - 9/5 12:03:47
     Other than setting minimum reserve levels for insurance - Spanky KU - 9/5 11:30:43
          The govt has no business setting reserve levels for - ummmm MU - 9/5 11:32:09
               Sure they do - Spanky KU - 9/5 15:56:18
     Or actually enforce the Repetitive Loss provisions and - Mo Texan MU - 9/5 11:25:16
     The moral hazard extends well beyond single home flood - ummmm MU - 9/5 11:08:15
     I agree. At the very least, no insurance house > 200K. - RHAYWORTH MU - 9/5 10:57:06
          So you want govt to put limits on which houses can get ins? - Badird MU - 9/5 11:49:02
               Companies been making bank on flood insurance - catbirdseat MU - 9/5 12:14:25
                    I don't know about that - DC Jayhawk KU - 9/5 12:24:32
                    Right, but that doesnt stop them from abusing customers - Badird MU - 9/5 12:21:14
                         I don't doubt that, but the numbers people - catbirdseat MU - 9/5 12:49:24
          This goes outside of hurricane prone areas. - Hbombtiger STL - 9/5 11:01:27
               RE: This goes outside of hurricane prone areas. - MOCO SON MU - 9/5 11:02:44
                    And earthquake areas, and tornado prone areas - tman KC - 9/5 11:56:14
                         so basically don't live within 200 miles of a coast or - catbirdseat MU - 9/5 12:15:34
                              No you can live there. There will also be insurance just - tman KC - 9/5 12:18:59
     RE: SIAP: Get government out of flood insurance! - MOCO SON MU - 9/5 10:51:03
          They need to relocate themselves. It's not the government's - Hbombtiger STL - 9/5 10:52:03
               RE: They need to relocate themselves. It's not the government's - MOCO SON MU - 9/5 10:59:33




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard