Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

It's not that simple. The Exclusionary Rule is much more

Posted on: May 18, 2017 at 10:18:39 CT
Mo Texan MU
Posts:
20130
Member For:
22.24 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
complex than just a simple yes it's in or no it's out. There are certainly situations where it could be excluded, but the opposite is also true.

Edited by Mo Texan at 10:18:56 on 05/18/17
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Prediction: the only one that will be indicted in all of - hefeweizen MU - 5/18 08:30:00
     If we had a Trump resign, Pence pardons him, - TigerJackSwartz MU - 5/18 08:35:49
          Yeah...that would be great - meatiger MU - 5/18 09:14:45
          Trump wont resign unless he is indicted for something. To - hefeweizen MU - 5/18 08:37:25
               I generally agree with you - meatiger MU - 5/18 09:16:21
               Can't be indicted - mizzoumurfkc MU - 5/18 09:02:51
                    US vs Nixon was never decided on those grounds so - hefeweizen MU - 5/18 09:06:39
               I dunno. He's stubborn, but I also think he's incredibly - TigerJackSwartz MU - 5/18 08:44:39
                    lazy? - ashtray UF - 5/18 08:46:25
                         people believe whatever it is they choose to believe or - 90Tiger MU - 5/18 08:48:04
                         He's fat. (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 5/18 08:47:45
                              and a billionaire (nm) - ashtray UF - 5/18 08:48:15
                                   Maybe - MrBlueSky MU - 5/18 08:50:23
                                        And? what does any of that have to do with him being lazy? - 90Tiger MU - 5/18 08:52:57
                                             Bush was very fit but he was dumb. There's always a - hefeweizen MU - 5/18 08:54:35
                                             All I said was he's fat. (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 5/18 08:54:02
                                                  and you said it in response to a post - so now we can add - 90Tiger MU - 5/18 08:59:05
     It could also really blow up in the dems faces if he looks - DHighlander NWMSU - 5/18 08:34:28
          Identifying the source doesn't negate the evidence. - Mo Texan MU - 5/18 08:54:29
               Actually it does. If the evidence was obtained illegally it - DHighlander NWMSU - 5/18 09:27:02
                    It's not that simple. The Exclusionary Rule is much more - Mo Texan MU - 5/18 10:18:39
          that's wishful thinking on your part(nm) - hefeweizen MU - 5/18 08:35:46
               Really? So far there is only one crime that we have actual - DHighlander NWMSU - 5/18 08:43:16
                    when the only thing you are worried about is the truth being - ashtray UF - 5/18 08:45:55
                         If that is the case why are the dems still upset about the - DHighlander NWMSU - 5/18 08:54:06
                              because Dems are just as bad as Repubs - ashtray UF - 5/18 08:56:08
                                   correct (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 5/18 09:02:17
                         that's a nice sentiment, but if you're going to accept that - 90Tiger MU - 5/18 08:50:26
                              I have no beef with that - ashtray UF - 5/18 08:52:48
                                   there wasn't any deed being kept secret. There is - 90Tiger MU - 5/18 08:54:24
                                        what were in the documents that were released pertaining to - ashtray UF - 5/18 08:55:30
                                             we don't know - but that's the rub, the "release" gives - 90Tiger MU - 5/18 09:07:36
                                                  crime bosses talking to other crime bosses should never - ashtray UF - 5/18 09:10:04
                                                       Well, here's the deal. If you view the govt as "crime bosse - 90Tiger MU - 5/18 09:13:37
                                                            yes, it makes sense - ashtray UF - 5/18 10:02:40
                                                            This is a point we agree upon. The simple solution, which - DHighlander NWMSU - 5/18 09:15:31
     Really ? Page, Manafort, Trump, Kushner - many players(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 5/18 08:34:10
          if Manafort gets indicted, so does Podesta. - Spanky KU - 5/18 08:37:51
          based on the facts we have to date. Grow up and stop - hefeweizen MU - 5/18 08:35:04
     Unless he flips - mizzoumurfkc MU - 5/18 08:32:52
          nothing to flip over if he's the only dirty player(nm) - hefeweizen MU - 5/18 08:33:34
               If, being the key word - mizzoumurfkc MU - 5/18 08:36:00
                    well yeah(nm) - hefeweizen MU - 5/18 08:38:42
     that is probably even a stretch(nm) - meatiger MU - 5/18 08:32:04
          maybe but I do think he's nuts and dirty as ****(nm) - hefeweizen MU - 5/18 08:33:04
               But seeings how he was high up in the Obama - DHighlander NWMSU - 5/18 08:38:46
                    more wishful thinking. Obama fired his ass(nm) - hefeweizen MU - 5/18 08:39:37
                         For political, not criminal reasons. Flynn refused to stop - DHighlander NWMSU - 5/18 08:48:52
                              sometimes people are fired and the reason given is not - ashtray UF - 5/18 08:50:59
          RE: that is probably even a stretch(nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 5/18 08:32:49
               this is just business as usual - ashtray UF - 5/18 08:37:31




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard