Welcome Guest

The courts need less empathy, less emotion, and less

Posted on: April 6, 2017 at 13:57:06 CT
hokie VT
Posts:
68046
Member For:
9.63 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
experience to operate than any part of government. They should be cold, unemotional, and offer only strict adherence to the constitution. Spineless lawmakers want to the courts to rule on poorly written laws and interpret them in such a way as to validate a certain politician's wishes.

A great example that I have posted about before, is the bakke decision. This decision permitted a minority with inferior grades to be accepted to medical school ahead of white people with better grades. Mr. Bakke filed suit.

His suit was denied in the lower courts because even though the Constitution and laws prohibit discrimination based on race, the medical school was allowed to do precisely that, because they thought it was a remedy to past discrimination.

That is an absurdity on its face. If Congress wants to legalize certain forms of discrimination, they should pass laws accordingly. The Supreme Court is not the place to rewrite laws or write new ones.

Experience shouldn't matter one whit.

The constitution says what it says. And a wise Latina with a history of being discriminated against, or oppressed as all women and all Hispanics are, offers nothing special in interpreting laws.

If the idiot Diane Feinstein Wants to protect the little guy, she should write laws that protect the little guy. She wants the courts to do what she is too lazy to do.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

     Republicans do not wish for legislate from the bench types. - DHighlander NWMSU - 4/6 14:18:01
          RE: Republicans do not wish for legislate from the bench types. - meatiger MU - 4/6 14:29:48
               Any ruling that is based upon anything but constitutionality - DHighlander NWMSU - 4/6 14:36:13
                    It is a tax - meatiger MU - 4/6 14:47:31
                         Nice semantic game there. But it was a swing and miss. - DHighlander NWMSU - 4/6 15:02:21
                              LOL - meatiger MU - 4/6 15:04:52
                                   Not health care you ijit. It is health insurance first of - DHighlander NWMSU - 4/6 16:00:11
          LOL uh huh - JG A - 4/6 14:21:49
               Sadly, this post is one of the most intelligent you have - DHighlander NWMSU - 4/6 14:38:34
                    LOL dude - JG A - 4/6 14:53:17
     I never thought so. If so, all the more reason the - GA Tiger MU - 4/6 13:48:18
     I agree--Gorsuch will never be a Ruth Bader Ginsburg - mu7176grad MU - 4/6 13:39:42
          The courts need less empathy, less emotion, and less - hokie VT - 4/6 13:57:06
               what about the bukkake decision?(nm) - cnk ATL - 4/6 13:58:40
          no doubt about that - FootballRefugee MU - 4/6 13:46:31
          Is he anti-nap or something?(nm) - Mormad MU - 4/6 13:45:56
               Pass out at one state of the union.......... - mu7176grad MU - 4/6 13:52:42




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard