 |
|
did that say they hadn't had a land-rent increase since 2004
Posted on: August 13, 2025 at 14:24:24 CT
Joeboo MU
Posts:
158627
Member For:
21.62 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
then the 450% makes sense. That should have been smaller increases every year over the past 2 decades.
That would have been about a 8% annual increase each year over 21 years. But take 0 for 21 years, now you get the full 450%
But it wasn't...so here we are
That would have been about a 8% annual increase each year over 21 years. But take 0 for 21 years, now you get the full 450%
But it wasn't...so here we are
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
did that say they hadn't had a land-rent increase since 2004 - Joeboo MU - 8/13 14:24:24