Welcome Guest

yes (nm)

Posted on: January 1, 2025 at 17:39:16 CT
90Tiger STL
Posts:
160798
Member For:
23.21 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
10
(nm) means no message
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

     That was the clearest example of targeting all season - Harvey Specter MU - 1/1 17:42:07
     Investigation .... lmao(nm) - tigerman81 MU - 1/1 16:55:25
     ASU had player sitting out 1st half for questionable - fatrat MU - 1/1 16:46:28
     Here's the rule - BigDave MU - 1/1 16:34:04
          Here’s the core problem, weve had 10 years of the rule being - alwaysright MU - 1/1 16:44:07
               Not true. It specifically addresses targeting against - DHighlander NWMSU - 1/1 17:06:46
                    Targeting means targeting not contacting. - alwaysright MU - 1/1 17:07:55
                         Read the damned rule, it is clearly spelled out(nm) - DHighlander NWMSU - 1/1 17:08:54
                              I know what the rule says, and I clearly stated that the - alwaysright MU - 1/1 17:17:36
                              You are way too emotionally involved in this. Did Sark - tigerman81 MU - 1/1 17:09:49
                                   I was hoping UT would win. It was a horrible call that had - DHighlander NWMSU - 1/1 17:31:15
                                        You say they got it wrong. You aren't the arbiter, they are - tigerman81 MU - 1/1 17:34:14
                                             Their on air rules analysist didn't even hesitate before - DHighlander NWMSU - 1/1 17:56:27
               You're confusing targeting with spearing. (nm) - phrejd KC - 1/1 16:56:13
                    If they hadn’t quit calling spearing, we wouldn’t have a - alwaysright MU - 1/1 17:01:43
                         Correct. Which is different than spearing (nm) - phrejd KC - 1/1 17:07:45
          Could care less who won,objectively,it was obvious targeting - Macgrantt MU - 1/1 16:37:28
               Not obvious targeting. Obvious contact to head but as below - Tiger Max MU - 1/1 17:07:00
                    Would have liked one in Mizzou game other night too but - Tiger Max MU - 1/1 17:19:10
                         Completely disagree in both cases - BigDave MU - 1/1 18:47:10
          It was absolutely targeting. Not sure why they - Outsider MU - 1/1 16:37:24
     Just remove targeting as a penalty. It’s not called - MrTruman2U MU - 1/1 16:30:59
          It's a game changing rule which makes it even more important - DHighlander NWMSU - 1/1 16:36:48
               I'd argue that letting a texas player be wide open two - tigerman81 MU - 1/1 16:56:40
                    They get that penalty called and those plays never happen(nm) - DHighlander NWMSU - 1/1 17:04:47
                         The problem is the call was reviewed and allowed to stand - OntheMark MU - 1/1 18:58:21
                         Calls get made and not made all the time. Thats the game - tigerman81 MU - 1/1 17:09:08
          RE: Just remove targeting as a penalty. It’s not called - wtk UT - 1/1 16:34:19
               When it is a defenseless player it does not have to be the - DHighlander NWMSU - 1/1 16:41:55
               Doesn't have to be the crown only. (nm) - Outsider MU - 1/1 16:38:44
                    he didn't even lead with his head, he ran up and hit him, - 90Tiger STL - 1/1 16:54:30
                         he ran up and hit him, head first, in the head(nm) - DHighlander NWMSU - 1/1 17:07:59
                         No (nm) - phrejd KC - 1/1 16:56:51
                              yes (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 1/1 17:39:16
               Yep, after replays I agree. (nm) - Uncle John KC - 1/1 16:36:54
          Agree with this. I think it's because the player will be - XRob MU - 1/1 16:32:37




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard