Welcome
Guest
Sign In
|
Register
BASKETBALL
FOOTBALL
ALL SPORTS
THE SHACK
TICKETS
POKER
POLITICS
WALL ST.
HELP / TESTING
ABOUT US
You're confusing targeting with spearing. (nm)
Posted on: January 1, 2025 at 16:56:13 CT
phrejd
STL
Posts:
95080
Member For:
16.28 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
(nm) means no message
Please explain why this message is being reported.
Reason For Report:
REPLY
Handle:
Password:
Subject:
MESSAGE THREAD
Need to be an investigation into that non-targeting call
-
OntheMark
MU
-
1/1 16:29:05
That was the clearest example of targeting all season
-
Harvey Specter
MU
-
1/1 17:42:07
Was definitely targeting! Another bribed NCAA call / no call
-
Turn2
MU
-
1/1 17:16:10
Investigation .... lmao(nm)
-
tigerman81
MU
-
1/1 16:55:25
ASU had player sitting out 1st half for questionable
-
fatrat
MU
-
1/1 16:46:28
Here's the rule
-
BigDave
MU
-
1/1 16:34:04
Here’s the core problem, weve had 10 years of the rule being
-
alwaysright
MU
-
1/1 16:44:07
Not true. It specifically addresses targeting against
-
DHighlander
NWMSU
-
1/1 17:06:46
Targeting means targeting not contacting.
-
alwaysright
MU
-
1/1 17:07:55
Read the damned rule, it is clearly spelled out(nm)
-
DHighlander
NWMSU
-
1/1 17:08:54
I know what the rule says, and I clearly stated that the
-
alwaysright
MU
-
1/1 17:17:36
You are way too emotionally involved in this. Did Sark
-
tigerman81
MU
-
1/1 17:09:49
I was hoping UT would win. It was a horrible call that had
-
DHighlander
NWMSU
-
1/1 17:31:15
You say they got it wrong. You aren't the arbiter, they are
-
tigerman81
MU
-
1/1 17:34:14
Their on air rules analysist didn't even hesitate before
-
DHighlander
NWMSU
-
1/1 17:56:27
You're confusing targeting with spearing. (nm)
-
phrejd
KC
-
1/1 16:56:13
If they hadn’t quit calling spearing, we wouldn’t have a
-
alwaysright
MU
-
1/1 17:01:43
Correct. Which is different than spearing (nm)
-
phrejd
KC
-
1/1 17:07:45
Could care less who won,objectively,it was obvious targeting
-
Macgrantt
MU
-
1/1 16:37:28
Not obvious targeting. Obvious contact to head but as below
-
Tiger Max
MU
-
1/1 17:07:00
Would have liked one in Mizzou game other night too but
-
Tiger Max
MU
-
1/1 17:19:10
Completely disagree in both cases
-
BigDave
MU
-
1/1 18:47:10
It was absolutely targeting. Not sure why they
-
Outsider
MU
-
1/1 16:37:24
RE: Need to be an investigation into that non-targeting call
-
MOCO SON
MU
-
1/1 16:33:53
Just remove targeting as a penalty. It’s not called
-
MrTruman2U
MU
-
1/1 16:30:59
It's a game changing rule which makes it even more important
-
DHighlander
NWMSU
-
1/1 16:36:48
I'd argue that letting a texas player be wide open two
-
tigerman81
MU
-
1/1 16:56:40
They get that penalty called and those plays never happen(nm)
-
DHighlander
NWMSU
-
1/1 17:04:47
The problem is the call was reviewed and allowed to stand
-
OntheMark
MU
-
1/1 18:58:21
Calls get made and not made all the time. Thats the game
-
tigerman81
MU
-
1/1 17:09:08
RE: Just remove targeting as a penalty. It’s not called
-
wtk
UT
-
1/1 16:34:19
When it is a defenseless player it does not have to be the
-
DHighlander
NWMSU
-
1/1 16:41:55
Doesn't have to be the crown only. (nm)
-
Outsider
MU
-
1/1 16:38:44
he didn't even lead with his head, he ran up and hit him,
-
90Tiger
STL
-
1/1 16:54:30
he ran up and hit him, head first, in the head(nm)
-
DHighlander
NWMSU
-
1/1 17:07:59
No (nm)
-
phrejd
KC
-
1/1 16:56:51
yes (nm)
-
90Tiger
STL
-
1/1 17:39:16
Yep, after replays I agree. (nm)
-
Uncle John
KC
-
1/1 16:36:54
Agree with this. I think it's because the player will be
-
XRob
MU
-
1/1 16:32:37