Welcome Guest

We've dealt with those problems for decades

Posted on: November 11, 2022 at 10:19:03 CT
BigDave MU
Posts:
8281
Member For:
25.92 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
This isn't hard. I have no problem with political party operatives driving people to polls, as long as the don't actually help them cast their ballot. If they physically can't go to the polls, the absentee process was a well-established process that worked and they can do that. The key part that made that process work was the signature on the ballot envelope had to be notorized, and there are people in hospitals and nursing homes that can do that without party operatives being involved. For the very small number of other cases, election officials should have non-partisan teams than go to people's houses and secure their ballot that way, but that is something people would have to request and it would only be allowed for certain cases.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

     Probably , but nothing that makes the slightest - JG MU - 11/11 12:34:50
     Yes(nm) - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 11/11 09:44:38
     Go with the evidence - Ferg MU - 11/11 09:42:08
          I'm reserving judgment on the AZ Secretary of State not - MIZ45 MU - 11/11 09:53:06
     yes, still going on in Arizona(nm) - Th8tnTiger MU - 11/11 09:39:49
     No (nm) - mizzoumurfkc KC - 11/11 09:37:02
     Of course. - ummmm MU - 11/11 09:36:52
          An evidence-free world suits you well(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 11/11 09:40:02
               Russian collusion. (nm) - ummmm MU - 11/11 09:42:17
                    Ample evidence of it pal - raskolnikov MU - 11/11 09:44:19
                         Your ample gal - Wildcat KSU - 11/11 09:50:48
                         So, you believe there is organized cheating in elections.(nm) - ummmm MU - 11/11 09:46:38
                              Not really so much no - raskolnikov MU - 11/11 09:55:44
                                   Did Trump "attempt to cheat" or did he "cheat" ? (nm) - ummmm MU - 11/11 10:18:51
                                        Which time? Be Specific. Manafort under the auspices - raskolnikov MU - 11/11 11:54:03
                                   facts come with evidence - ashtray UF - 11/11 09:57:10
                                        Manafort dypsht(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 11/11 10:03:58
                                             that's just a dude's name, not evidence - Th8tnTiger MU - 11/11 10:06:09
                                                  Be stupid and uninformed. It suits you(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 11/11 11:54:53
                                                  It's too easy - Wildcat KSU - 11/11 10:07:17
                                             Try again(nm) - Wildcat KSU - 11/11 10:05:34
                              lol(nm) - Th8tnTiger MU - 11/11 09:47:27
               irony (nm) - ashtray UF - 11/11 09:40:31
     Yes, with mail-in ballots - BigDave MU - 11/11 09:34:44
          How do you vote if you are not physically capable of going - KC rules MU - 11/11 10:09:26
               And I forgot something - BigDave MU - 11/11 10:22:13
                    RE: And I forgot something - KC rules MU - 11/11 10:30:17
                         That is not what biometric verification is - BigDave MU - 11/11 12:04:28
               We've dealt with those problems for decades - BigDave MU - 11/11 10:19:03
          mail in ballots have zero security. - RHAYWORTH MU - 11/11 09:39:21
     Yes - Reagan STL - 11/11 09:30:08
          Yes (nm) - bluesox7 MU - 11/11 09:31:55
     there(nm) - Wildcat KSU - 11/11 09:29:00




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard