Welcome Guest

No, that was the intent of a modern day

Posted on: June 30, 2022 at 13:00:29 CT
DHighlander NWMSU
Posts:
46315
Member For:
15.74 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
attempting to explain away a point they does not agree with their world view. But as I have explained even if you accept their view it still set the constitutional precedence for for Congress controlling immigration.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

     The real problem here is that the founding documents were - DHighlander NWMSU - 6/30 11:40:07
          You said it better than i did. nm - hokie VT - 6/30 11:48:32
          The plain meaning of the Constitution is paramount - Wilco MU - 6/30 11:47:39
               No, just like with laws the wording is all that matters. - DHighlander NWMSU - 6/30 11:55:48
                    then that clause only applies to the 13 original States - cnk ATL - 6/30 12:06:06
                    in that case, you can forget the 2A - ashtray UF - 6/30 12:00:04
                         Can you show that Migration had a different meaning when - DHighlander NWMSU - 6/30 12:07:35
                              it's already been shown.. you just choose to ignore it - ashtray UF - 6/30 12:08:22
                                   No, that was the intent of a modern day - DHighlander NWMSU - 6/30 13:00:29
                                        incorrect - ashtray UF - 6/30 13:05:17
                         It also could literally mean a right to "bear arms" - ummmm MU - 6/30 12:01:41
                              intent doesn't matter, according to DH - ashtray UF - 6/30 12:02:50
                                   Welp, I just ordered a pair of bear arms - kmawv8 MU - 6/30 12:04:48
                    You aren’t listening (nm) - Wilco MU - 6/30 11:59:13
                         I'm listening, but as usual your opinions do not matter to - DHighlander NWMSU - 6/30 12:03:51
                              You aren’t listening - Wilco MU - 6/30 12:08:18
                              yes there is a way - ashtray UF - 6/30 12:04:53
                                   So you have the personal notes of every single person - DHighlander NWMSU - 6/30 12:09:26
                                        the debates? Yes, they are easily searchable - ashtray UF - 6/30 12:10:47
                                             Every single debate that took place on the floor of every - DHighlander NWMSU - 6/30 13:04:01
                                                  that's not how it worked - ashtray UF - 6/30 13:05:40
                    Intent is all that matters. - ummmm MU - 6/30 11:58:33
     The legislative debates were recorded - Wilco MU - 6/30 11:37:39
          And they ultimately decided on the wording that was - DHighlander NWMSU - 6/30 11:46:13
               The debates are windows - Wilco MU - 6/30 11:48:32
                    And you get them from the perspective of the person who - DHighlander NWMSU - 6/30 11:59:48
                         You aren’t listening - Wilco MU - 6/30 12:02:07
          You may have noticed that a lot of the idiots on this board - hokie VT - 6/30 11:43:42
               This doesn't appear to address what I just said. (nm) - ummmm MU - 6/30 11:47:58
                    it's what he does after he's twisted himself into a pretzel - ashtray UF - 6/30 12:02:02
               You’re doing it again. Try taking my advice (nm) - Wilco MU - 6/30 11:46:10
                    He had never heard of this clause before today. - ummmm MU - 6/30 11:47:40
                         I know. It’s just sad that he can’t allow himself - Wilco MU - 6/30 11:49:17




©2024 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard