 |
|
Macon was first and got two drives, I believe
Posted on: November 8, 2021 at 14:16:15 CT
zoomer 99
Posts:
14147
Member For:
5.45 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
Second resulted in FG and chance at TD, first resulted in punt from near midfield. Cook played rest of half, I think. Gained a couple firsts, crossed the 50 on one drive, no scoring.
2nd half, Cook led our longest two drive playwise, neither reaching redzone. Missed FG, made FG. Scrambled well. Seemed we were playing to cover the spread with field goals at that point, down by 35+
Macon had last drive of game, had a couple deep sideline passes to get us to goalline, a couple TD chances, turnover on downs. That was our longest drive in terms of yards.
Both ran read option stuff pretty well, keeping and running. Macon had some successful QB designed runs. Cook offense looked like with Bazelak except he could run, so run option was more effective.
Both QBs had receivers drop passes. Macon had worse deliveries, sidearm stuff. Cook had a nice deep ball dropped.
Edited by zoomer at 14:31:05 on 11/08/21
2nd half, Cook led our longest two drive playwise, neither reaching redzone. Missed FG, made FG. Scrambled well. Seemed we were playing to cover the spread with field goals at that point, down by 35+
Macon had last drive of game, had a couple deep sideline passes to get us to goalline, a couple TD chances, turnover on downs. That was our longest drive in terms of yards.
Both ran read option stuff pretty well, keeping and running. Macon had some successful QB designed runs. Cook offense looked like with Bazelak except he could run, so run option was more effective.
Both QBs had receivers drop passes. Macon had worse deliveries, sidearm stuff. Cook had a nice deep ball dropped.
Edited by zoomer at 14:31:05 on 11/08/21
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
- 
Macon was first and got two drives, I believe - zoomer 99 - 11/8 14:16:15