Welcome Guest

And that very thing happens now

Posted on: April 15, 2021 at 12:51:48 CT

4TigersinMichigan MU

Posts:

126978

Member For:

22.80 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

yet the courts are full of disagreements that still arise. And there is great disagreement between the parties of what was agreed to and what was supposed to happen. Yet somehow your system will avoid this.

You just can't explain how.

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

4Tigs.. this is a product of the government you support. - TigerMatt STL - 4/15 12:25:02

RE: 4Tigs.. this is a product of the government you support. - MOCO SON MU - 4/15 12:31:16

Yes. And if the Equali Act got through, gay activists could - TigerMatt STL - 4/15 12:34:45

How so? - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 4/15 12:26:50

First, without the government there would be no claim. - TigerMatt STL - 4/15 12:28:07

No system will prevent people from pursuing perceived - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 4/15 12:34:27

Incorrect. In a private law society, there is no claim - TigerMatt STL - 4/15 12:35:43

what would prevent a frivoulus law suit in a private law - blake1771 MU - 4/15 12:40:03

nothing would - pickle MU

- 4/15 12:51:28

you would need to find a court - meatiger MU - 4/15 12:41:43

why would that be difficult? you're dealing with people. not - blake1771 MU - 4/15 12:44:49

If there was no relationship between the baker and the gays - TigerMatt STL - 4/15 12:47:38

there wasn't in our current system either, but here we are. - blake1771 MU - 4/15 12:50:10

There are anti discrimination laws - meatiger MU - 4/15 13:10:37

Because government forces involuntary relationships. They - TigerMatt STL - 4/15 12:54:33

Which is another issue created by government. Those lawsuits - TigerMatt STL - 4/15 12:43:32

the only thing that could have been done - meatiger MU - 4/15 12:38:40

It would most certainly happen once people entered into a - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 4/15 12:38:35

no. It would not be an involuntary relationship - pickle MU

- 4/15 12:52:26

You're not smart enough to even think beyond the - kmawv8 KC - 4/15 12:43:50

What I just said would certainly happen - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 4/15 12:45:16

You're forgetting many steps to the example presented before - kmawv8 KC - 4/15 12:46:55

The many steps all work as long as both sides are in - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 4/15 12:49:42

There is no involuntary element to any of it at all (nm) - pickle MU

- 4/15 12:57:45

It isn't involuntary. They participated in contract - TigerMatt STL - 4/15 12:56:18

The moment an arbitrator rules against them and they say - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 4/15 13:05:11

that is incorrect, but you’re hurting “gvmt is voluntary” - pickle MU

- 4/15 13:12:25

involuntary is such a big word - ashtray UF - 4/15 12:56:51

False. You're really, really dumb (nm) - kmawv8 KC - 4/15 12:51:59

you could have stopped after the word "think" (nm) - ashtray UF - 4/15 12:44:26

My contention is there never would have been a baker - TigerMatt STL - 4/15 12:40:16

And any system will at some point force involuntary - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 4/15 12:42:34

No (nm) - pickle MU

- 4/15 12:53:17

No, they won't (nm) - kmawv8 KC - 4/15 12:45:26

Explain how it is avoided - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 4/15 12:47:52

false. I don't care to attempt to educate someone unwilling - kmawv8 KC - 4/15 12:48:53

Here's a nugget to think about. - kmawv8 KC - 4/15 12:50:53

And if you lose the dispute, again you signed the contract - TigerMatt STL - 4/15 13:22:18

and if the losing party court shops - pickle MU

- 4/15 13:24:53

And likely loss of future business as competitors become - TigerMatt STL - 4/15 13:27:12

yes (nm) - pickle MU

- 4/15 13:29:10

I get it - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 4/15 12:50:16

There is no involuntary element whatsoever (nm) - pickle MU

- 4/15 12:59:27

LOL, right (nm) - kmawv8 KC - 4/15 12:51:08

Not true. You are forcing the dynamics of a statist - TigerMatt STL - 4/15 12:44:41

So I I enter into a voluntary contract, and then down the - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 4/15 12:46:45

This was already explained. It is in the interest of both - TigerMatt STL - 4/15 12:48:40

And that very thing happens now - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 4/15 12:51:48

It's been explained to you many, many times. - kmawv8 KC - 4/15 12:53:36

Like there is never a dispute - tman MU - 4/15 12:51:07

Who said that? (nm) - kmawv8 KC - 4/15 12:53:56

It's like they don't realize all those things are spelled - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 4/15 12:53:11

Know why? Because government has forced alteration - TigerMatt STL - 4/15 13:01:09

No, there will be the very same issues in these - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 4/15 13:08:57

Courts gave themselves the power to void or alter - TigerMatt STL - 4/15 13:20:39

or you're just an idiot - ashtray UF - 4/15 12:56:01

There are clearly written clauses to get out of - kmawv8 KC - 4/15 12:48:18

Cause he keeps inventing reasons that there must be a - TigerMatt STL - 4/15 12:49:18

If one person refuses to sell to another person - meatiger MU - 4/15 12:39:49

Where do you sue? Government. Courts? - tman MU - 4/15 12:42:04