Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

My contention is there never would have been a baker

Posted on: April 15, 2021 at 12:40:16 CT
TigerMatt STL
Posts:
96969
Member For:
26.48 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
having to defend himself in court because some gays targeted him for his beliefs.

That is a government created problem because governments force involuntary relationships.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

4Tigs.. this is a product of the government you support. - TigerMatt STL - 4/15 12:25:02
     RE: 4Tigs.. this is a product of the government you support. - MOCO SON MU - 4/15 12:31:16
          Yes. And if the Equali Act got through, gay activists could - TigerMatt STL - 4/15 12:34:45
     How so? - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 4/15 12:26:50
          First, without the government there would be no claim. - TigerMatt STL - 4/15 12:28:07
               No system will prevent people from pursuing perceived - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 4/15 12:34:27
                    Incorrect. In a private law society, there is no claim - TigerMatt STL - 4/15 12:35:43
                         what would prevent a frivoulus law suit in a private law - blake1771 MU - 4/15 12:40:03
                              nothing would - pickle MU - 4/15 12:51:28
                              you would need to find a court - meatiger MU - 4/15 12:41:43
                                   why would that be difficult? you're dealing with people. not - blake1771 MU - 4/15 12:44:49
                                        If there was no relationship between the baker and the gays - TigerMatt STL - 4/15 12:47:38
                                             there wasn't in our current system either, but here we are. - blake1771 MU - 4/15 12:50:10
                                                  There are anti discrimination laws - meatiger MU - 4/15 13:10:37
                                                  Because government forces involuntary relationships. They - TigerMatt STL - 4/15 12:54:33
                                   Which is another issue created by government. Those lawsuits - TigerMatt STL - 4/15 12:43:32
                         the only thing that could have been done - meatiger MU - 4/15 12:38:40
                         It would most certainly happen once people entered into a - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 4/15 12:38:35
                              no. It would not be an involuntary relationship - pickle MU - 4/15 12:52:26
                              You're not smart enough to even think beyond the - kmawv8 KC - 4/15 12:43:50
                                   What I just said would certainly happen - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 4/15 12:45:16
                                        You're forgetting many steps to the example presented before - kmawv8 KC - 4/15 12:46:55
                                             The many steps all work as long as both sides are in - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 4/15 12:49:42
                                                  There is no involuntary element to any of it at all (nm) - pickle MU - 4/15 12:57:45
                                                  It isn't involuntary. They participated in contract - TigerMatt STL - 4/15 12:56:18
                                                       The moment an arbitrator rules against them and they say - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 4/15 13:05:11
                                                            that is incorrect, but you’re hurting “gvmt is voluntary” - pickle MU - 4/15 13:12:25
                                                       involuntary is such a big word - ashtray UF - 4/15 12:56:51
                                                  False. You're really, really dumb (nm) - kmawv8 KC - 4/15 12:51:59
                                   you could have stopped after the word "think" (nm) - ashtray UF - 4/15 12:44:26
                              My contention is there never would have been a baker - TigerMatt STL - 4/15 12:40:16
                                   And any system will at some point force involuntary - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 4/15 12:42:34
                                        No (nm) - pickle MU - 4/15 12:53:17
                                        No, they won't (nm) - kmawv8 KC - 4/15 12:45:26
                                             Explain how it is avoided - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 4/15 12:47:52
                                                  false. I don't care to attempt to educate someone unwilling - kmawv8 KC - 4/15 12:48:53
                                                       Here's a nugget to think about. - kmawv8 KC - 4/15 12:50:53
                                                            And if you lose the dispute, again you signed the contract - TigerMatt STL - 4/15 13:22:18
                                                                 and if the losing party court shops - pickle MU - 4/15 13:24:53
                                                                      And likely loss of future business as competitors become - TigerMatt STL - 4/15 13:27:12
                                                                           yes (nm) - pickle MU - 4/15 13:29:10
                                                       I get it - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 4/15 12:50:16
                                                            There is no involuntary element whatsoever (nm) - pickle MU - 4/15 12:59:27
                                                            LOL, right (nm) - kmawv8 KC - 4/15 12:51:08
                                        Not true. You are forcing the dynamics of a statist - TigerMatt STL - 4/15 12:44:41
                                             So I I enter into a voluntary contract, and then down the - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 4/15 12:46:45
                                                  This was already explained. It is in the interest of both - TigerMatt STL - 4/15 12:48:40
                                                       And that very thing happens now - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 4/15 12:51:48
                                                            It's been explained to you many, many times. - kmawv8 KC - 4/15 12:53:36
                                                       Like there is never a dispute - tman MU - 4/15 12:51:07
                                                            Who said that? (nm) - kmawv8 KC - 4/15 12:53:56
                                                            It's like they don't realize all those things are spelled - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 4/15 12:53:11
                                                                 Know why? Because government has forced alteration - TigerMatt STL - 4/15 13:01:09
                                                                      No, there will be the very same issues in these - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 4/15 13:08:57
                                                                           Courts gave themselves the power to void or alter - TigerMatt STL - 4/15 13:20:39
                                                                 or you're just an idiot - ashtray UF - 4/15 12:56:01
                                                  There are clearly written clauses to get out of - kmawv8 KC - 4/15 12:48:18
                                                       Cause he keeps inventing reasons that there must be a - TigerMatt STL - 4/15 12:49:18
                              If one person refuses to sell to another person - meatiger MU - 4/15 12:39:49
                                   Where do you sue? Government. Courts? - tman MU - 4/15 12:42:04




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard