Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

No, Donald Trump didn't want to repeal section 230

Posted on: April 5, 2021 at 12:09:41 CT
kmawv8 MU
Posts:
90744
Member For:
15.45 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
as a whole. He wanted places that were selectively censoring speech to lose their protections (twitter). He didn't want Section 230 gone.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Is Justice Thomas correct? - TigerJackSwartz MU - 4/5 11:22:02
     YES - mu4ever DUKE - 4/5 12:14:21
     RE: Is Justice Thomas correct? - JayHoaxH8r MU - 4/5 12:12:43
     No - El-ahrairah BAMA - 4/5 12:01:56
     Didn't read that but my guess is no.(nm) - GA Tiger MU - 4/5 11:50:40
     probably not - pickle MU - 4/5 11:40:32
          ^ agrees with DOC (nm) - SwampTiger MU - 4/5 11:42:32
     I am 100% for free speech but if you ever visited 8chan - Say_What MU - 4/5 11:38:32
          That is what they are doing now. The repeal would take - DHighlander NWMSU - 4/5 11:56:27
     RE: Is Justice Thomas correct? - scan MU - 4/5 11:24:56
          Exactly, they get protection from 230 (thought it was 320) - hokie VT - 4/5 11:27:57
               Repealing 230 would blow up in your face (nm) - Say_What MU - 4/5 11:42:03
                    No it wouldn't (nm) - mizzouSECedes STL - 4/5 11:48:16
                         Yes it would. It would cause all speech to be regulated - Say_What MU - 4/5 11:48:47
                              Yeah, heaven forbid media tell the truth, right? (nm) - mizzouSECedes STL - 4/5 12:12:21
                                   they shouldn’t be forced to (nm) - pickle MU - 4/5 12:14:47
                                        Then they are editorializing not hosting. No one says they - DHighlander NWMSU - 4/5 12:17:32
                                             It doesn’t matter what they’re doing - pickle MU - 4/5 12:19:31
                              It would also open the door to new hosting sites that would - DHighlander NWMSU - 4/5 11:58:36
                                   Are you a denizen of 4chan? Have you seen the crap posted - Say_What MU - 4/5 12:04:38
                                        I avoid those sites. The problem is that Google and FB have - DHighlander NWMSU - 4/5 12:11:48
                                             Nick controls content here by not allowing certain things - kmawv8 KC - 4/5 12:14:34
                                             no (nm) - pickle MU - 4/5 12:12:47
                                                  Another in the long line of insightful posts by Pizzle. 👏(nm) - DHighlander NWMSU - 4/5 12:15:33
                                   If you repealed it, there wouldn't be any protections to - kmawv8 KC - 4/5 12:01:58
                                        Not for the companies that lost it. - DHighlander NWMSU - 4/5 12:05:23
                                             If I misunderstood him, then I apologize. - kmawv8 KC - 4/5 12:06:37
                                                  I am talking about repeal section 230 as a whole - Say_What MU - 4/5 12:08:08
                                                       No, Donald Trump didn't want to repeal section 230 - kmawv8 KC - 4/5 12:09:41
                                                            Exactly - mizzouSECedes STL - 4/5 12:14:27
                                                            That is my understanding. Either abide by the requirements - DHighlander NWMSU - 4/5 12:13:43
                                                                 Well, perhaps a conversation for another day or thread, but - kmawv8 KC - 4/5 12:16:39
                                                                      Also worth discussion. But if a site is truly just hosting - DHighlander NWMSU - 4/5 12:23:57
                                                                           It wouldn't be a blanket repeal, since 230 allows - mizzouSECedes STL - 4/5 12:25:36
                                                                                It should be a blanket repeal. - kmawv8 KC - 4/5 12:30:04
                                                                                     I would tend to agree generally - mizzouSECedes STL - 4/5 12:31:08
                              no, it would not - pickle MU - 4/5 11:54:33
                                   Yes it would pickle. I am not confusing anything - Say_What MU - 4/5 12:06:12
                                        There would still be exceptions for illegal content - mizzouSECedes STL - 4/5 12:24:45
                                        but you aren’t responsible - pickle MU - 4/5 12:11:57
                              That is very likely to be the case. To make the website - GA Tiger MU - 4/5 11:53:16
     the Twitter question confuses 1st Amendment with the - Ace AU - 4/5 11:24:48




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard