Welcome Guest

They didn't even have to find irregularities in the PA case,

Posted on: February 22, 2021 at 10:13:11 CT

MUTGR MU

Posts:

68846

Member For:

24.81 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

just state the obvious: they violated their own state constitution by changing the voting rules the way they did.

If suit was filed before the election, they could dismiss it for lack of standing - nobody has been harmed.

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

More conservative snowflakes... - Gyro MU - 2/22 09:39:15

Why did Zuck donate $400 million to steal the election? - TigerFan92 STL - 2/22 11:19:23

How does that point to being a snowflake? - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 2/22 10:16:39

kraken still awaiting release (nm) - TigerJackSwartz MU

- 2/22 10:08:16

U r a true zyro. - yy4u MU - 2/22 10:05:31

Denied as moot. SCOTUS is part of the problem... - MUTGR MU - 2/22 10:02:08

no. they denied certiorari.(nm) - gmmm98 MU

- 2/22 10:41:22

The SC denies the problem because they fear the solution. - DHighlander NWMSU - 2/22 10:10:36

They didn't even have to find irregularities in the PA case, - MUTGR MU - 2/22 10:13:11

Will the SC be equally hands off if the backlash is states - DHighlander NWMSU - 2/22 10:19:10

RE: Will the SC be equally hands off if the backlash is states - MUTGR MU - 2/22 10:25:57

So the challenging of election law changes equates to being - DHighlander NWMSU - 2/22 10:00:26

how is that an example of a snowflake? (nm) - Sal CMSU - 2/22 09:52:05