Welcome Guest

The SC denies the problem because they fear the solution.

Posted on: February 22, 2021 at 10:10:36 CT
DHighlander NWMSU
Posts:
51161
Member For:
16.89 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
If they were to acknowledge that there were election irregularities sufficient enough to affect the outcome the only recourse would be to invalidate the election and force a new one.

What judge is going to be willing to make that decision? It is much easier to just say no and move on.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

More conservative snowflakes... - Gyro MU - 2/22 09:39:15
     Why did Zuck donate $400 million to steal the election? - TigerFan92 STL - 2/22 11:19:23
     How does that point to being a snowflake? - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 2/22 10:16:39
     kraken still awaiting release (nm) - TigerJackSwartz MU - 2/22 10:08:16
     U r a true zyro. - yy4u MU - 2/22 10:05:31
     Denied as moot. SCOTUS is part of the problem... - MUTGR MU - 2/22 10:02:08
          no. they denied certiorari.(nm) - gmmm98 MU - 2/22 10:41:22
          The SC denies the problem because they fear the solution. - DHighlander NWMSU - 2/22 10:10:36
               They didn't even have to find irregularities in the PA case, - MUTGR MU - 2/22 10:13:11
                    Will the SC be equally hands off if the backlash is states - DHighlander NWMSU - 2/22 10:19:10
                         RE: Will the SC be equally hands off if the backlash is states - MUTGR MU - 2/22 10:25:57
     So the challenging of election law changes equates to being - DHighlander NWMSU - 2/22 10:00:26
     how is that an example of a snowflake? (nm) - Sal CMSU - 2/22 09:52:05




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard