Welcome Guest

wrong in the last 20 years or so

Posted on: October 11, 2020 at 18:24:26 CT

JG MU

Posts:

256868

Member For:

21.65 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

134

1% of mail in votes get tossed for various reasons

20% are sent to wrong place, sent too late or sent back too late

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

Prediction and a poll - JG A - 10/11 16:58:33

Why can't people just go to the poll?(nm) - tcat KC - 10/11 17:59:46

I'm saying they SHOULD - JG A - 10/11 18:16:01

10% failure rate seems low for the post office(nm) - El-ahrairah BAMA - 10/11 17:22:11

When I got voter suppressed in 1976 - JG A - 10/11 17:26:03

You didn't get voter supressed liar - Calca STL - 10/11 18:09:18

Multiple democrat voter fraud examples have been given - Calca STL - 10/11 17:08:43

list them - JG A - 10/11 17:10:21

LMAO you bury your head in the sand? - Calca STL - 10/11 18:06:11

Two of the cases were about local elections - JG A - 10/11 18:21:30

So you then go on to ignore the examples given - Calca STL - 10/11 19:52:56

They don't speak to the point - JG A - 10/11 20:08:32

Google is your friend. Even for libs(nm) - tman MU - 10/11 17:12:37

LOL yup - JG A - 10/11 17:13:36

So basically, you can't. Nm - SparkyStalcup MU - 10/11 17:13:30

I can. Google voter fraud. Rather teach you how to fish - tman MU - 10/11 17:56:18

So still you can't. Nm - SparkyStalcup MU - 10/11 18:18:06

LOL the first page is almost entirely - JG A - 10/11 17:58:58

Of course. Does that surprise you? No wonder the monkeys - tman MU - 10/11 18:02:43

LOL lying about things you know nothing about to support - JG A - 10/11 18:15:17

Why are libs supressing vote by demanding universal - tman MU - 10/11 17:07:57

Quite the opposite. They are enabling fraudulent votes which - MizzouTigerz MU

- 10/11 17:50:47

fraudulent votes DO happen - JG A - 10/11 17:57:09

Prove fraudulent votes have never successfully turned an - MizzouTigerz MU

- 10/11 18:05:42

Prove that Comey's October surprise didn't hand the election - SparkyStalcup MU - 10/11 18:27:40

I didn't make the claim. That was JG. Try to keep up with - MizzouTigerz MU

- 10/11 19:24:30

The most famous case was 1964 - JG A - 10/11 18:22:47

How would that even suppress the vote? Dumb nm - SparkyStalcup MU - 10/11 17:12:02

Because aprox 20 percent end up getting rejected - tman MU - 10/11 17:58:55

wrong in the last 20 years or so - JG A - 10/11 18:24:26

Wrong. You are confusing absentee balloting - tman MU - 10/11 19:37:01

nope - JG A - 10/11 20:39:52

Link? 20% sounds incorrect. Nm - SparkyStalcup MU - 10/11 18:20:40

link? - JG A - 10/11 17:09:06

You dont believe that libs want mail in voting - tman MU - 10/11 17:11:35

How does that suppress votes? - JG A - 10/11 17:19:00

Because approx 20 percent end up getting rejected - tman MU - 10/11 18:06:10

LOL yes 21% get suppressed - JG A - 10/11 18:27:45

Link? In Colorado, fewer than 1% of ballots get rejected. - SparkyStalcup MU - 10/11 18:23:17

How does that suppress the vote? Nm - SparkyStalcup MU - 10/11 17:12:48