Welcome Guest

fraudulent votes DO happen

Posted on: October 11, 2020 at 17:57:09 CT

JG MU

Posts:

255545

Member For:

21.51 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

126

they are very rare and have never successfully
turned an election (well in the last 100 years or so)

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

Prediction and a poll - JG A - 10/11 16:58:33

Why can't people just go to the poll?(nm) - tcat KC - 10/11 17:59:46

I'm saying they SHOULD - JG A - 10/11 18:16:01

10% failure rate seems low for the post office(nm) - El-ahrairah BAMA - 10/11 17:22:11

When I got voter suppressed in 1976 - JG A - 10/11 17:26:03

You didn't get voter supressed liar - Calca STL - 10/11 18:09:18

Multiple democrat voter fraud examples have been given - Calca STL - 10/11 17:08:43

list them - JG A - 10/11 17:10:21

LMAO you bury your head in the sand? - Calca STL - 10/11 18:06:11

Two of the cases were about local elections - JG A - 10/11 18:21:30

So you then go on to ignore the examples given - Calca STL - 10/11 19:52:56

They don't speak to the point - JG A - 10/11 20:08:32

Google is your friend. Even for libs(nm) - tman MU - 10/11 17:12:37

LOL yup - JG A - 10/11 17:13:36

So basically, you can't. Nm - SparkyStalcup MU - 10/11 17:13:30

I can. Google voter fraud. Rather teach you how to fish - tman MU - 10/11 17:56:18

So still you can't. Nm - SparkyStalcup MU - 10/11 18:18:06

LOL the first page is almost entirely - JG A - 10/11 17:58:58

Of course. Does that surprise you? No wonder the monkeys - tman MU - 10/11 18:02:43

LOL lying about things you know nothing about to support - JG A - 10/11 18:15:17

Why are libs supressing vote by demanding universal - tman MU - 10/11 17:07:57

Quite the opposite. They are enabling fraudulent votes which - MizzouTigerz MU

- 10/11 17:50:47

fraudulent votes DO happen - JG A - 10/11 17:57:09

Prove fraudulent votes have never successfully turned an - MizzouTigerz MU

- 10/11 18:05:42

Prove that Comey's October surprise didn't hand the election - SparkyStalcup MU - 10/11 18:27:40

I didn't make the claim. That was JG. Try to keep up with - MizzouTigerz MU

- 10/11 19:24:30

The most famous case was 1964 - JG A - 10/11 18:22:47

How would that even suppress the vote? Dumb nm - SparkyStalcup MU - 10/11 17:12:02

Because aprox 20 percent end up getting rejected - tman MU - 10/11 17:58:55

wrong in the last 20 years or so - JG A - 10/11 18:24:26

Wrong. You are confusing absentee balloting - tman MU - 10/11 19:37:01

nope - JG A - 10/11 20:39:52

Link? 20% sounds incorrect. Nm - SparkyStalcup MU - 10/11 18:20:40

link? - JG A - 10/11 17:09:06

You dont believe that libs want mail in voting - tman MU - 10/11 17:11:35

How does that suppress votes? - JG A - 10/11 17:19:00

Because approx 20 percent end up getting rejected - tman MU - 10/11 18:06:10

LOL yes 21% get suppressed - JG A - 10/11 18:27:45

Link? In Colorado, fewer than 1% of ballots get rejected. - SparkyStalcup MU - 10/11 18:23:17

How does that suppress the vote? Nm - SparkyStalcup MU - 10/11 17:12:48