Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

Do they have subpoena power over previous GJ testimony?(nm)

Posted on: September 13, 2019 at 20:23:54 CT
DHighlander NWMSU
Posts:
50793
Member For:
16.73 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
(nm) means no message
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

This is a losing argument - Ace AU - 9/13 19:12:01
     Yes...Dems will lose because they have not shown the need - Spanky KU - 9/13 20:56:55
     You are aware that they have it 180 degrees backwards, right - DHighlander NWMSU - 9/13 20:05:06
     Congress has no right to grand jury materials - ScottsdaleTiger MU - 9/13 20:03:37
          If it involve potus they are the right venue - Ace AU - 9/13 20:32:34
               Venue has nothing to do with it - ScottsdaleTiger MU - 9/13 21:16:24
     Wouldn't they get that information if they moved forward - tcat KC - 9/13 19:37:07
          Why would impeachment proceedings entitle them to GJ - DHighlander NWMSU - 9/13 20:07:53
               Your correct, but if they think that testimony is evidence - tcat KC - 9/13 20:19:55
                    Do they have subpoena power over previous GJ testimony?(nm) - DHighlander NWMSU - 9/13 20:23:54
                         Interesting question - ScottsdaleTiger MU - 9/13 21:25:25
          They have to re-cover the same ground as Mueller did, i.e. - ScottsdaleTiger MU - 9/13 20:07:31
     Liars don’t link. Nm - hokie VT - 9/13 19:14:15




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard