Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

So why bother investigating then if you won't prosecute?(nm)

Posted on: May 10, 2019 at 19:04:57 CT
TigerMatt STL
Posts:
93910
Member For:
26.31 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
18
(nm) means no message
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Here is the real question - limenats MU - 5/10 18:09:41
     I mean, we did see Comey write Hillary’s exoneration before - MIZ45 MU - 5/10 21:54:23
     You're missing the bigger picture here - I assume out of - MUTGR MU - 5/10 20:06:06
          You have a great deal of opinion in there friend - raskolnikov MU - 5/11 13:37:00
          Why would numbnuts be upset about an abuse of power. - RayKinsella1922 SEC - 5/10 20:29:11
               RE: Why would numbnuts be upset about an abuse of power. - limenats MU - 5/10 21:06:19
                    It doesn't matter - if you want anyone eliminated you're - RayKinsella1922 SEC - 5/10 21:18:02
                         Conservative - noun - limenats MU - 5/10 21:23:48
                              who told you trump supporters are conservatives? (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 5/10 21:35:11
                                   RE: who told you trump supporters are conservatives? (nm) - limenats MU - 5/10 21:37:32
                                        Your confusion is congenital.(nm) - RayKinsella1922 SEC - 5/10 22:49:08
     Silly hypothesis - *M* KC - 5/10 19:18:12
          I personally disagree. - limenats MU - 5/10 19:19:09
     The real question is, What does the evidence say? - MizzouTigerz MU - 5/10 19:00:13
          No one "acted together" outside of doing their jobs - raskolnikov MU - 5/10 19:11:51
               Page and Strzok acted together plenty, and it was not only - MizzouTigerz MU - 5/11 03:47:22
               RE: No one "acted together" outside of doing their jobs - scan MU - 5/10 19:13:14
                    Ha ha ha ha Uh huh(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 5/10 19:24:12
                         RE: Ha ha ha ha Uh huh(nm) - scan MU - 5/10 19:27:54
     RE: Here is the real question - MOCO SON MU - 5/10 18:47:37
     Trump could have fired Mueller (nm) - Sal KC - 5/10 18:29:53
          He tried. - limenats MU - 5/10 18:31:29
               RE: He tried. - MOCO SON MU - 5/10 19:11:52
                    So you think Don McGahn is lying? - limenats MU - 5/10 19:17:43
                         RE: So you think Don McGahn is lying? - scan MU - 5/10 19:18:45
                              It's his word against Trump's. - limenats MU - 5/10 19:22:03
                                   RE: It's his word against Trump's. - scan MU - 5/10 19:23:36
                                        LOL the buffoon doesn't have any credibility - mizzoumurfkc KC - 5/10 19:45:01
                                        I don't know about that. - limenats MU - 5/10 19:27:06
                                             RE: I don't know about that. - scan MU - 5/10 19:31:37
               "NOBODY DOESN'T FOLLOW MY ORDERS!" - mizzoumurfkc KC - 5/10 18:35:28
               How does one "try" to fire somebody - Sal KC - 5/10 18:33:05
                    You order it done and no one follows your order. - limenats MU - 5/10 18:35:01
                         Trump could have literally fired Mueller (nm) - Sal KC - 5/10 18:37:36
                              The buffoon is a - mizzoumurfkc KC - 5/10 18:40:21
                                   If he wanted Mueller gone, he could have fired him (nm) - Sal KC - 5/10 18:51:06
                                        Hillary could have gotten the job done..... - Tigrrrr! MU - 5/10 18:55:31
                                        RE: If he wanted Mueller gone, he could have fired him (nm) - scan MU - 5/10 18:55:18
                                        He's a pussy, Sal - mizzoumurfkc KC - 5/10 18:52:29
                                             Completely false - TigerMatt STL - 5/10 18:58:03
                                             So you're admitting he didn't obstruct (nm) - Sal KC - 5/10 18:53:30
                                                  No! - mizzoumurfkc KC - 5/10 18:57:34
                                                       No! That wasn't Mueller's job. It was to evaluate the - MizzouTigerz MU - 5/10 19:16:42
                                                            I would agree that he does not "represent" Congress. - limenats MU - 5/10 19:20:51
                                                       "possible" obstruction - Sal KC - 5/10 18:59:01
                                                       So where are the indictments?(nm) - TigerMatt STL - 5/10 18:58:26
                                                            Apparently, it's DOJ policy not to indict a sitting Pres. - limenats MU - 5/10 19:01:49
                                                                 The OLC's opinion isn't what kept Mueller from - Sal KC - 5/10 20:22:15
                                                                 Yep... which is why the buffoon doesn't want - mizzoumurfkc KC - 5/10 19:11:35
                                                                      Nope, the OLC's opinion - Sal KC - 5/10 20:24:24
                                                                 So why bother investigating then if you won't prosecute?(nm) - TigerMatt STL - 5/10 19:04:57
                                                                      To determine if grounds to impeach exist. - limenats MU - 5/10 19:05:48
                                                                           lol (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 5/10 21:23:01
                                                                           Impeachment is not the point of an SC investigation - Sal KC - 5/10 20:29:31
                                                                                Repeat that 10 times. - limenats MU - 5/10 21:44:05
     couldn’t care less (nm) - pickle MU - 5/10 18:23:21
     Are you running away from your earlier assertions that - JeffB MU - 5/10 18:22:54
          I don't dispute that the FBI is being investigated. - limenats MU - 5/10 18:28:57
               Then why did you post this a little bit ago? ... - JeffB MU - 5/10 18:31:28
                    I'll ask you the same question I asked earlier since - limenats MU - 5/10 18:33:59
                         I posted a few below. - JeffB MU - 5/10 18:46:51
                              No you did not. - limenats MU - 5/10 18:52:17
                                   arr's investigation into origins of Russia probe expands - JeffB MU - 5/10 19:02:39
                                        I read that too. No mention of criminal investigation of - limenats MU - 5/10 19:16:13
                                             It certainly sounds like one according to those involved.(nm) - JeffB MU - 5/10 20:00:59
                                   Kevin R. Brock, former assistant director of intelligence - JeffB MU - 5/10 18:57:04
                                        That's an opinion piece. - limenats MU - 5/10 19:00:07
                                             Look at all of them & who's being quoted or interviewed. - JeffB MU - 5/10 19:04:03
                                                  I think Trump is trying to discredit his investigators. - limenats MU - 5/10 19:09:47
                    RE: Then why did you post this a little bit ago? ... - scan MU - 5/10 18:32:50
                         LAUGH Comey is literally right in front of them - mizzoumurfkc KC - 5/10 18:45:57
                              He just can't remember much while under oath. (nm) - JeffB MU - 5/10 18:52:12
     The buffoon would also have - mizzoumurfkc KC - 5/10 18:16:09
          Don't need Trump to believe that. - TigerMatt STL - 5/10 18:22:22
               Did you know Reagan was senile during or after his - limenats MU - 5/10 18:25:35
     The collusion was obvious. the obstruction a slam dunk - JG MU - 5/10 18:15:42
          RE: The collusion was obvious. the obstruction a slam dunk - scan MU - 5/10 18:17:55
     RE: Here is the real question - scan MU - 5/10 18:14:58
          will this be before or after he locks hillary up? - tigerdb MU - 5/10 18:26:15
               RE: will this be before or after he locks hillary up? - scan MU - 5/10 18:27:16
                    I think everything that you posted was incorrect - tigerdb MU - 5/10 18:34:25
                         Exactly... you are 100% correct - mizzoumurfkc KC - 5/10 18:50:00
                         RE: I think everything that you posted was incorrect - scan MU - 5/10 18:36:41
                              horowitz will release his report and nunez/fox/etal - tigerdb MU - 5/10 19:06:11
     It is as if you have no idea what happened.(nm) - TigerMatt STL - 5/10 18:10:43




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard