Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

RE: The men who did the investigation don't share your beliefs

Posted on: April 10, 2019 at 08:32:15 CT
None**** MU
Posts:
4919
Member For:
7.28 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
A Times story based on anonymous second hand sources said to be "familiar with the Investigators' thinking" is not confirmation of anything. If they were certain of their position, why don't they come out and openly challenge Barr. Clearly, Mueller has no problem with Barr's summary of his report.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

SIAP: Barr team investigating counterintelligence against DT - TigerMatt STL - 4/9 23:13:44
     Too much Bushco in the mix to ever - Newcatbirdseat MU - 4/10 07:37:54
     see the NYT's article posted below - Sal KC - 4/10 07:05:21
          RE: see the NYT's article posted below - None**** MU - 4/10 07:26:34
               Yep (nm) - Sal KC - 4/10 07:26:56
          Truth comes out when the report is released - raskolnikov MU - 4/10 07:18:35
               RE: Truth comes out when the report is released - None**** MU - 4/10 07:28:11
                    The men who did the investigation don't share your beliefs - raskolnikov MU - 4/10 08:04:44
                         Keep that flame of hope burning.(nm) - TigerMatt STL - 4/10 09:28:21
                         RE: The men who did the investigation don't share your beliefs - None**** MU - 4/10 08:32:15
                         According to an article full of anonymous - Sal KC - 4/10 08:08:45
               Of course that has nothing to do - Sal KC - 4/10 07:25:24
               I would simply ask where your feeling comes from - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 4/10 07:24:01
                    RE: I would simply ask where your feeling comes from - None**** MU - 4/10 07:28:39
                    Are you actually suggesting that Rask be logical and - DHighlander NWMSU - 4/10 07:26:52
                    You're not remembering that Barr is Trump's HAND PICKED - Floyd Turbo 99 - 4/10 07:26:10
                         Do you fools really think Mueller would just silently sit - DHighlander NWMSU - 4/10 07:30:43
                              Mueller is a party first Republican and isn't an - Floyd Turbo 99 - 4/10 07:32:47
                                   You are an imbecile. Two months ago Mueller was going to be - DHighlander NWMSU - 4/10 07:35:50
                                        He is a GOP operative. The evil genius of Trump getting - Floyd Turbo 99 - 4/10 07:38:25
                                             HAND PICKED - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 4/10 07:57:19
                         Oh, that’s right. Trump HAND PICKED Barr - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 4/10 07:29:32
                         RE: You're not remembering that Barr is Trump's HAND PICKED - None**** MU - 4/10 07:29:28
                              It's sarcasm - FootballRefugee MU - 4/10 07:32:46
     Yes and the best part is that stupid Comey laid out a - None**** MU - 4/9 23:22:43
          Oh yes...DC partisan investigations - meatiger MU - 4/9 23:31:33
               The difference is Democrats broke the law, Trump didn't - Coors4bob MU - 4/10 06:40:08
                    you have no idea - meatiger MU - 4/10 08:00:54
                    Hillary didn't either - JayHoaxH8r MU - 4/10 07:18:23
                         "lock her up"(nm) - tigerdb MU - 4/10 07:57:54
               You just experienced two years of waste - Logan BAMA - 4/10 03:54:58
                    it was a couple years ago, but yes, Benghazi/servergate - tigerdb MU - 4/10 06:39:41
                         nice whatabout (nm) - Sal KC - 4/10 07:05:33
                         RE: it was a couple years ago, but yes, Benghazi/servergate - None**** MU - 4/10 06:47:28
                              They don't know how to think for themselves - Sal KC - 4/10 07:08:01
                                   lmao...coming from one that is dumber than ****(nm) - tigerdb MU - 4/10 07:09:48
                                        You say that, but in your attempts to argue - Sal KC - 4/10 07:26:19
                                             LMAO...like your logic that Stephen Miller is clearly not - tigerdb MU - 4/10 07:57:24
                                                  I didn't make the accusation that he was a white - Sal KC - 4/10 08:01:47
                                                       You made the assertion that he was "clearly not" - why is he - tigerdb MU - 4/10 08:06:26
                                                            He's clearly not because there is no evidence that he is - Sal KC - 4/10 08:11:21
                                                                 No - your view that there is no evidence doesn't mean that - tigerdb MU - 4/10 08:23:19
                                                                      This post makes zero sense - Sal KC - 4/10 08:39:19
                                                                           I didn't admit anything - and I didn't state that he is/is - tigerdb MU - 4/10 08:47:38
                                                                                You have to prove to me you aren't a child rapist - Sal KC - 4/10 09:04:42
                                                                                     I don't have to prove anything to you - tigerdb MU - 4/10 09:23:37
                                                                                          Provide evidence you aren't a child rapist - Sal KC - 4/10 09:25:47
                                                                                               I can see why you failed at being a cop... - tigerdb MU - 4/10 09:29:06
                                                                                                    Just admit you can’t provide the evidence (nm) - Sal KC - 4/10 09:59:15
                                                                                                         LOL...is that the best you've got? - tigerdb MU - 4/10 10:40:16
                                                                                                              So you can't provide evidence? - Sal KC - 4/10 11:12:09
                                                                                                                   You're stupid son... - tigerdb MU - 4/10 11:45:53
                                        Those are always Sal's most hilarious posts - mizzoumurfkc KC - 4/10 07:15:45
                              No - clearly you do not understand the meaning of a hoax - tigerdb MU - 4/10 07:03:54
                                   RE: No - clearly you do not understand the meaning of a hoax - None**** MU - 4/10 07:17:31
                                        Link? - tigerdb MU - 4/10 08:26:35
                                   None related to the election and all of it happened - hefeweizen MU - 4/10 07:12:57
                                   Russia has been interfering in our elections for - Sal KC - 4/10 07:07:13
     It needs to be re-posted. Nothing is happening. nm. - MUTGR MU - 4/9 23:20:31
          Probably not. Or a few minor capegoats get arrested.(nm) - TigerMatt STL - 4/9 23:30:47
          Given his past, Im not a big fan of Barr - Uncle Fester USMC - 4/9 23:23:23
               RE: Given his past, Im not a big fan of Barr - MUTGR MU - 4/9 23:29:19
                    Im not but he is kinda Swampy - Uncle Fester USMC - 4/9 23:30:50
                         RE: Im not but he is kinda Swampy - MUTGR MU - 4/9 23:31:57
                              Not saying that at all - Uncle Fester USMC - 4/9 23:38:16




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard