Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

he did and he didn't, right?

Posted on: April 4, 2019 at 08:56:05 CT
gmmm98 MU
Posts:
13786
Member For:
15.35 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
he quoted an article from a site with a strong right wing bias and attributed it to a different article from a different site.

at best it's wild ignorance.

ffs. rule 6 isn't difficult reading to butcher it as horribly as he has the last couple days. it almost has to be intentionally done. like i said. kudos.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

The New York Times is at it again with anonymous sources - Sal KC - 4/4 07:19:04
     your reading skills are pretty awful - gmmm98 MU - 4/4 07:50:04
          lol he quoted the article - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 4/4 07:59:28
               he did and he didn't, right? - gmmm98 MU - 4/4 08:56:05
                    lol what?? - Sal KC - 4/4 09:08:53
               Yeah, I have no idea what he's talking about - Sal KC - 4/4 08:21:37
          Please elaborate (nm) - Sal KC - 4/4 07:57:03
     You don't have to be very smart to know - mizzoumurfkc KC - 4/4 07:37:19
          Well no kidding - Sal KC - 4/4 07:41:15
     RE: The New York Times is at it again with anonymous sources - None**** MU - 4/4 07:36:06
     Aren't you looking forward to the next Fri night jerk fest - Toger STL - 4/4 07:31:52
          Why wait for a Friday night? (nm) - Sal KC - 4/4 07:32:30
               I don't know. I didn't get an invitation last time.(nm) - Toger STL - 4/4 07:38:36




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard