 |
|
The New York Times is at it again with anonymous sources
Posted on: April 4, 2019 at 07:19:04 CT
Sal CMSU
Posts:
229171
Member For:
21.98 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
claiming some of Mueller's investigators are saying the findings are worse than Barr concluded.
However, they were forced to include this in the NYT's article "Those interviewed by The Times did not fully explain why they believe their findings are worse for the president than Mr. Barr disclosed. It is also not clear how prevalent the frustration is among Mr. Mueller’s team." This is exactly why Rule 6(e) exists.
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/apr/4/some-mueller-investigators-say-report-worse-donald/
Edited by Sal at 07:21:17 on 04/04/19
However, they were forced to include this in the NYT's article "Those interviewed by The Times did not fully explain why they believe their findings are worse for the president than Mr. Barr disclosed. It is also not clear how prevalent the frustration is among Mr. Mueller’s team." This is exactly why Rule 6(e) exists.
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/apr/4/some-mueller-investigators-say-report-worse-donald/
Edited by Sal at 07:21:17 on 04/04/19
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
The New York Times is at it again with anonymous sources - Sal KC - 4/4 07:19:04
-