Welcome Guest

Did he address this in the hearing?

Posted on: July 20, 2018 at 12:31:08 CT
Badird MU
Posts:
8826
Member For:
9.61 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
I fail to see that it is related based on the context.

I undertand what you are trying to say, but it doesnt jibe with the context of the texts in general. The Mueller case is not defined by its corporate investigations...
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

     would you care for some cheese with that whine? - raskolnikov MU - 7/20 11:50:33
          RE: That text was about a case involving corporate investigation - MUTGR MU - 7/20 12:02:08
          Thanks for clarifying. I had not read about this before(nm) - KenMan33 MU - 7/20 11:40:05
          No - it was about his prospective participation in the - tigerdb MU - 7/20 11:39:49
               Can you clarify/elaborate? - Badird MU - 7/20 11:41:00
                    He was expressing reservations about joining Mueller's - MUTGR MU - 7/20 11:57:13
                         keep trying. do not give up(nm) - KenMan33 MU - 7/20 12:05:06
                    RE: Can you clarify/elaborate? - tigerdb MU - 7/20 11:46:05
                         Did he address this in the hearing? - Badird MU - 7/20 12:31:08
                              Yes he did. - tigerdb MU - 7/20 12:36:09
     Wait I thought Strzok was out to get Trump. I cannot keep - KenMan33 MU - 7/20 11:31:32
          No, its a false flag taken completely out of context. (nm) - Badird MU - 7/20 11:34:54
     Now the trumpeters believe Strzok? - tigerdb MU - 7/20 11:26:15
          Doesn't change the obvious meaning one bit, but the - MUTGR MU - 7/20 11:37:16
               Context changes the meaning of everything. - tigerdb MU - 7/20 11:42:13
                    RE: Context changes the meaning of everything. - MUTGR MU - 7/20 11:57:43
                         LOL - are you simply an apologist, or are you really this - tigerdb MU - 7/20 12:02:47
                              RE: LOL - are you simply an apologist, or are you really this - MUTGR MU - 7/20 12:24:48
               His IMMEDIATE text following was this: - Badird MU - 7/20 11:38:28
                    why would "is just about the realistic outcomes of this case - blake1771 KC - 7/20 12:01:53
                    RE: His IMMEDIATE text following was this: - MUTGR MU - 7/20 11:58:03
          we believe he was honest in his texts & rarely honest in his - blake1771 KC - 7/20 11:27:03
               RE: we believe he was honest in his texts & rarely honest in his - Badird MU - 7/20 11:35:50
               He wasn't as dishonest as simply pasting half the text. - tigerdb MU - 7/20 11:30:14
                    The text says what it says, and reportedly Page confirmed - MUTGR MU - 7/20 12:03:11
                         unless Page's full text from her congressional hearings are - KenMan33 MU - 7/20 12:12:05
                              More so than the FBI, DOJ and intelligence officials. nm. - MUTGR MU - 7/20 12:31:25
                         The text says "his gut sense"(nm) - tigerdb MU - 7/20 12:04:10
          and you don't? - FootballRefugee MU - 7/20 11:26:45




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard