Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

That text was about a case involving corporate investigation

Posted on: July 20, 2018 at 11:34:32 CT
Badird MU
Posts:
8826
Member For:
9.61 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
as one of her last cases.

Feel free to read the full text exchange and tell me otherwise...

INBOX

A) you and 1 both know the odds are nothing. If 1 thought it was
likely, I'd be there no question. 1 hesitate in part because of my
gut sense and concern there's no big there there.

sms

2017-05-19
00:58:32, Fri_

OUTBOX

A) Pete. Let's talk about this tomorrow. \U0001f621

sms

2017-05-19

00:58:59, Fri

INBOX

Regardless of the outcome, 1 think there's a certain savvy business
decision for you to do it \n\n600k/year + doing white hat
corporate investigations isn't a bad exit strategy.

https://archive.org/stream/StrzokPageTexts/FBI-texts_djvu.txt
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

5/19/17 Strzok: : "....There's no big there there.. - MUTGR MU - 7/20 11:15:21
     would you care for some cheese with that whine? - raskolnikov MU - 7/20 11:50:33
     That text was about a case involving corporate investigation - Badird MU - 7/20 11:34:32
          RE: That text was about a case involving corporate investigation - MUTGR MU - 7/20 12:02:08
          Thanks for clarifying. I had not read about this before(nm) - KenMan33 MU - 7/20 11:40:05
          No - it was about his prospective participation in the - tigerdb MU - 7/20 11:39:49
               Can you clarify/elaborate? - Badird MU - 7/20 11:41:00
                    He was expressing reservations about joining Mueller's - MUTGR MU - 7/20 11:57:13
                         keep trying. do not give up(nm) - KenMan33 MU - 7/20 12:05:06
                    RE: Can you clarify/elaborate? - tigerdb MU - 7/20 11:46:05
                         Did he address this in the hearing? - Badird MU - 7/20 12:31:08
                              Yes he did. - tigerdb MU - 7/20 12:36:09
     Wait I thought Strzok was out to get Trump. I cannot keep - KenMan33 MU - 7/20 11:31:32
          No, its a false flag taken completely out of context. (nm) - Badird MU - 7/20 11:34:54
     Now the trumpeters believe Strzok? - tigerdb MU - 7/20 11:26:15
          Doesn't change the obvious meaning one bit, but the - MUTGR MU - 7/20 11:37:16
               Context changes the meaning of everything. - tigerdb MU - 7/20 11:42:13
                    RE: Context changes the meaning of everything. - MUTGR MU - 7/20 11:57:43
                         LOL - are you simply an apologist, or are you really this - tigerdb MU - 7/20 12:02:47
                              RE: LOL - are you simply an apologist, or are you really this - MUTGR MU - 7/20 12:24:48
               His IMMEDIATE text following was this: - Badird MU - 7/20 11:38:28
                    why would "is just about the realistic outcomes of this case - blake1771 KC - 7/20 12:01:53
                    RE: His IMMEDIATE text following was this: - MUTGR MU - 7/20 11:58:03
          we believe he was honest in his texts & rarely honest in his - blake1771 KC - 7/20 11:27:03
               RE: we believe he was honest in his texts & rarely honest in his - Badird MU - 7/20 11:35:50
               He wasn't as dishonest as simply pasting half the text. - tigerdb MU - 7/20 11:30:14
                    The text says what it says, and reportedly Page confirmed - MUTGR MU - 7/20 12:03:11
                         unless Page's full text from her congressional hearings are - KenMan33 MU - 7/20 12:12:05
                              More so than the FBI, DOJ and intelligence officials. nm. - MUTGR MU - 7/20 12:31:25
                         The text says "his gut sense"(nm) - tigerdb MU - 7/20 12:04:10
          and you don't? - FootballRefugee MU - 7/20 11:26:45




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard