Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

he answered cummings and said he could see why but then

Posted on: July 12, 2018 at 11:39:05 CT
blake1771 MU
Posts:
14453
Member For:
20.02 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
later said the texts exhibited NO bias and furthermore he couldn't tell you why he was fired from the SC.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Strzok--test messages weren't indication of bias - mu7176grad MU - 7/12 11:00:59
     I am not watching today, but thats not what was said. - Badird MU - 7/12 11:05:43
          He is stating that was Strzok's words, not the IG's (nm) - Sal KC - 7/12 11:21:53
               I cant comment on that. - Badird MU - 7/12 11:30:10
                    he answered cummings and said he could see why but then - blake1771 KC - 7/12 11:39:05
                         oh man, that is strange (nm) - Sal KC - 7/12 11:42:11
                         lol thats wild. (nm) - Badird MU - 7/12 11:41:04
                              yeah, wildly inaccurate - tigerdb MU - 7/12 11:44:51
                                   Did you not read blake's post? - Sal KC - 7/12 11:50:41
                                        yeah, I read Blake's take on the facts. - tigerdb MU - 7/12 12:11:38
                                             What did he say that was inaccurate? (nm) - Sal KC - 7/12 12:51:40
                                   So he basically said exactly what I said below. - Badird MU - 7/12 11:49:11
                    Because it was a political opinion allowable under Hatch Act - mu7176grad MU - 7/12 11:38:18
                         Thats a bit stretched, IMO. Not apples:apples (nm) - Badird MU - 7/12 11:40:29
                    I am not watching either so I don't know (nm) - Sal KC - 7/12 11:31:59
          You just missed his recent comment then - mu7176grad MU - 7/12 11:07:59
               Did he say WHY he said that? - Badird MU - 7/12 11:31:01
                    The texts do show bias which makes that comment weird - Sal KC - 7/12 11:33:06
                         He testified under oath...those were his personal views - tigerdb MU - 7/12 11:43:07
                              RE: He testified under oath...those were his personal views - Sal KC - 7/12 11:44:23
                                   RE: He testified under oath...those were his personal views - tigerdb MU - 7/12 11:45:41
                                        That leaves out his later response (nm) - Sal KC - 7/12 11:51:17
                         I agree. Thats kind of what I was saying, too. - Badird MU - 7/12 11:34:45
               Badbirdbrain doesn't have to know what he’s talking about, - hokie VT - 7/12 11:12:43
     well they are an indication of bias - Sal KC - 7/12 11:05:15
     Just as JG is a true conservative - Calca STL - 7/12 11:04:48
     and he has no idea and can't fathom why Mueller canned him - blake1771 KC - 7/12 11:04:46
          The appearance of impropriety is impropriety. - Badird MU - 7/12 11:06:50
               95 % of Congress should go too - mu7176grad MU - 7/12 11:53:48




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard