Welcome Guest

That's not much, and that was BEFORE we lost 2 of our

Posted on: March 2, 2018 at 15:18:53 CT

myself MU

Posts:

1740

Member For:

8.06 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

Q1 wins which just happened recently.

There's a big difference between 6 and 4 when that's the primary criteria for the selection committee, as most analysts and bracketologists are saying.

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

Katz is right on top of it.... - blackngold MU - 3/2 14:56:58

"Missouri should be fine with six Q1 wins"... The problem - myself MU - 3/2 15:01:53

You also have to consider how weak the field is this - alwaysright MU - 3/2 17:09:57

There are 9 teams between Mizzou and the bubble - wu-tangtiger MU - 3/2 15:07:18

That's not much, and that was BEFORE we lost 2 of our - myself MU - 3/2 15:18:53

USCe could easily be a quad 1 win again - MrBlueSky MU - 3/2 15:19:42

It's possible, but they're projected by computers to finish - myself MU - 3/2 15:20:26

You aren't factoring in the Mizzou nut kick effect - MidMoBaller4Life MU - 3/2 15:08:30

I don't believe in it(nm) - DevilsAdvocate MU - 3/2 15:16:02

If Mike is playing I feel much better about the nut kick(nm) - MidMoBaller4Life MU - 3/2 15:21:07

That would probably help our chances. (nm) - myself MU - 3/2 15:21:41

Last spot will come down to OU and MU - Mizzmi27 MU - 3/2 15:11:40

# of Q1 wins is why OU is still projected to make the field - myself MU - 3/2 15:21:18

That's a good argument against quadrants - zodiac6 JC - 3/2 15:05:58

Agreed, but that's the system this year. Q2 wins count for - myself MU - 3/2 15:16:52

I imagine at the end of the day, next Sunday - MrBlueSky MU - 3/2 15:06:57

Your handle is fitting (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 3/2 15:03:39

It's just Sue(nm) - MidMoBaller4Life MU - 3/2 15:07:43