Welcome Guest

That's a good argument against quadrants

Posted on: March 2, 2018 at 15:05:58 CT

zodiac6 JC

Posts:

83015

Member For:

23.99 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

Any system like this will have to use some arbitrary cutoff. A win over a team ranked 70 shouldn't count any differently than a team ranked 71, but it does.

As imperfect as a more subjective approach would be, I think I prefer it.

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

Katz is right on top of it.... - blackngold MU - 3/2 14:56:58

"Missouri should be fine with six Q1 wins"... The problem - myself MU - 3/2 15:01:53

You also have to consider how weak the field is this - alwaysright MU - 3/2 17:09:57

There are 9 teams between Mizzou and the bubble - wu-tangtiger MU - 3/2 15:07:18

That's not much, and that was BEFORE we lost 2 of our - myself MU - 3/2 15:18:53

USCe could easily be a quad 1 win again - MrBlueSky MU - 3/2 15:19:42

It's possible, but they're projected by computers to finish - myself MU - 3/2 15:20:26

You aren't factoring in the Mizzou nut kick effect - MidMoBaller4Life MU - 3/2 15:08:30

I don't believe in it(nm) - DevilsAdvocate MU - 3/2 15:16:02

If Mike is playing I feel much better about the nut kick(nm) - MidMoBaller4Life MU - 3/2 15:21:07

That would probably help our chances. (nm) - myself MU - 3/2 15:21:41

Last spot will come down to OU and MU - Mizzmi27 MU - 3/2 15:11:40

# of Q1 wins is why OU is still projected to make the field - myself MU - 3/2 15:21:18

That's a good argument against quadrants - zodiac6 JC - 3/2 15:05:58

Agreed, but that's the system this year. Q2 wins count for - myself MU - 3/2 15:16:52

I imagine at the end of the day, next Sunday - MrBlueSky MU - 3/2 15:06:57

Your handle is fitting (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 3/2 15:03:39

It's just Sue(nm) - MidMoBaller4Life MU - 3/2 15:07:43