Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

There is, simply, no believable explanation for the Dems

Posted on: February 5, 2018 at 09:03:33 CT
TigerJackSwartz MU
Posts:
64231
Member For:
17.48 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
saying on one hand, releasing it is damaging to nat'l security, and then saying on the other hand, the memo is virtually meaningly
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

For a memo that the Dems are claiming is "nothing" - Sal KC - 2/5 08:43:24
     as far as i know only 4 people read all the underlying - blake1771 KC - 2/5 09:43:44
          Should that say 'Schiff says it's political to say that and - JeffB MU - 2/5 10:18:20
               yes, thanks. fixed - blake1771 KC - 2/5 10:27:33
     One other thing - meatiger MU - 2/5 09:33:21
     Probably politics as usual/talking points/us vs them - meatiger MU - 2/5 09:12:07
          Sure, it's fun for us - Sal KC - 2/5 09:14:54
               So you enjoy - meatiger MU - 2/5 09:16:47
                    No, I said I enjoy talking about them - Sal KC - 2/5 09:18:47
                         I'd rather the politicians find something productive to do, - tigerdb MU - 2/5 09:24:32
                         ok - meatiger MU - 2/5 09:21:33
     Yup. Some of the few socialists who actually read the memo - hokie VT - 2/5 09:00:30
          It was similar to Comey's tweet - Sal KC - 2/5 09:02:55
               What you fail to acknowledge is that nunez's original - tigerdb MU - 2/5 09:27:10
                    Why don't the Ds make that point? Or m maybe you can - hokie VT - 2/5 09:33:53
                         HG - as you should be aware, nunez didn't send the memo - tigerdb MU - 2/5 09:36:56
                              Schiff-hole didn’t say what was changed. Why don’t - hokie VT - 2/5 09:41:31
     I would guess because they had know idea what was in - recruiter MU - 2/5 09:00:23
          They knew what was in it; nunez changed the memo after - tigerdb MU - 2/5 09:34:18
          If they didn't know what was in it - Sal KC - 2/5 09:02:20
               Maybe once the Dems knew what was in the memo they wanted to - recruiter MU - 2/5 09:06:59
                    They still tried to block the release - Sal KC - 2/5 09:08:08
                         Possibly egging Trump in knowing that he controlled the memo - recruiter MU - 2/5 09:12:27
                              The messaging was wrong on the process as well - Sal KC - 2/5 09:14:16
                                   True but once Trump declassified the memo there was no way - recruiter MU - 2/5 09:19:35
               I would also guess they were afraid of what editing that - recruiter MU - 2/5 09:04:33
                    They were afraid of editing? What does that mean? And - hokie VT - 2/5 09:08:16
                         They claimed Nunes changed the messaging completely - Sal KC - 2/5 09:09:14
                              Just another lie. Another excuse to block the - hokie VT - 2/5 09:13:30
                    Possibly, but like I already stated - Sal KC - 2/5 09:06:43
                         Fair point* - recruiter MU - 2/5 09:07:31
               There is, simply, no believable explanation for the Dems - TigerJackSwartz MU - 2/5 09:03:33
          They all knew what was in it. Many read it - TigerJackSwartz MU - 2/5 09:01:42
     They are disingenuous, trying to play both sides of the - TigerJackSwartz MU - 2/5 08:58:26
     It's one guy's opinions - MrBlueSky MU - 2/5 08:45:24
          I think part of it was the Dems didn't know what the final - playhard NWMSU - 2/5 08:47:34
               Agreed. Nunes has proven to be a follower of trump(nm) - recruiter MU - 2/5 09:03:14
                    Member of the Trump transition team - Silas MU - 2/5 09:16:24
                    The focus on Nunes is the wrong tactic - Sal KC - 2/5 09:05:16
               What changes did Nunes make that the Democrats objected to?(nm) - JeffB MU - 2/5 08:52:45
                    They never said - Sal KC - 2/5 08:53:31
               I may have missed it - Sal KC - 2/5 08:49:31
          Wasn't there a unanimous vote - Sal KC - 2/5 08:47:06




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard