Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

No it doesnt. If the economic growth

Posted on: December 20, 2017 at 09:58:39 CT
tman MU
Posts:
36072
Member For:
21.59 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
Is the reason for the revenue growth, which in this case it was.

People had lower tax rates, and the economy boomed. Hence, a person might pay more in absolute dollars in taxes, but they still paid a lower rate.

Under the tax system we have that is not a bad thing.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

If the "slashing taxes = burgeoning growth" failed so - TigerJackSwartz MU - 12/20 09:19:00
     Out of curiosity, I looked up state per capita tax - ummmm MU - 12/20 09:56:04
          RE: Out of curiosity, I looked up state per capita tax - MOCO SON MU - 12/20 10:26:18
          Even after the big cuts Kansas is in no way a low tax state. - DHighlander NWMSU - 12/20 10:19:09
          the graph in the upper right is the better - meatiger MU - 12/20 10:05:54
     A couple of things - meatiger MU - 12/20 09:52:43
     You have to remember republicans are fundamentally - JG A - 12/20 09:50:30
     Kansas' unemployment rate was 6.8% when Brownback took - Spanky KU - 12/20 09:41:50
          LOL - meatiger MU - 12/20 09:54:03
               Kansas' Labor Participation rate is 67.1% (15th in the US) - Spanky KU - 12/20 10:04:03
                    It is a stupid game - meatiger MU - 12/20 10:07:19
                         I am just showing you actual data that refutes the OP - Spanky KU - 12/20 10:23:20
                              no..you are cherry picking data - meatiger MU - 12/20 10:42:00
                                   I am using unemployment..which is what most people use - Spanky KU - 12/20 10:49:08
                                        So by that metric - meatiger MU - 12/20 11:15:39
                                             Not with your metric of Labor Participation Rate. - Spanky KU - 12/20 11:45:07
     I live in JoCo. Some schools in W KS only can go for 4 days - shawnfennkc MU - 12/20 09:40:30
     Don't worry, within 6-10 years, the Federal Gov't - MrBlueSky MU - 12/20 09:27:36
          Obama just doubled the debt. YPAFS. - Coors4bob MU - 12/20 09:28:52
               Reagan was the first president to triple the debt - MrBlueSky MU - 12/20 09:30:05
                    When you use percentages to argue a monetary case, you lose - Spanky KU - 12/20 09:44:17
                    180% but the payback extended into the next president - Coors4bob MU - 12/20 09:35:00
                    He also increased the revenue to the Gov - tman KC - 12/20 09:32:34
                         You say that like it's a good thing - pickle MU - 12/20 09:35:49
                              He did it and lowered personal tax rates - tman KC - 12/20 09:47:21
                                   "He also increased revenue to the Gov" - pickle MU - 12/20 09:51:09
                                        No it doesnt. If the economic growth - tman KC - 12/20 09:58:39
                                             I'm sorry, but that didn't happen. And paying more - pickle MU - 12/20 10:20:47
          Lost *tax bounty* - ummmm MU - 12/20 09:28:23
               No matter how you spin it with your - MrBlueSky MU - 12/20 09:29:43
                    I don't care about the deficit. I care about returning - ummmm MU - 12/20 09:35:21
                    It didn't with Reagan. Look it up - tman KC - 12/20 09:31:11
                         1981: $1 trillion debt. 1989 $3 trillion debt - MrBlueSky MU - 12/20 09:33:14
                              Revenue not the national debt. Try again - tman KC - 12/20 09:51:05
                                   Every bit of gvmt increased under Reagan - pickle MU - 12/20 09:52:20
                                        So what this isn't the point of the thread - tman KC - 12/20 10:03:53
                                             You're the one who brought up Reagan and is holding him up - pickle MU - 12/20 10:14:28
                         Reagan didn't cut taxes - pickle MU - 12/20 09:32:22
                              Oh ok(nm) - tman KC - 12/20 09:33:05
                                   Here - pickle MU - 12/20 09:34:27
                                        He did cut taxes as shown by the initial revenue drop to the - tman KC - 12/20 09:45:14
                                             That is not an example of cutting taxes. (nm) - ummmm MU - 12/20 09:51:28
                                                  He cut the rates and revenues dropped. - tman KC - 12/20 09:59:22
                                                       That's not true (nm) - pickle MU - 12/20 10:14:51
                                                       Except taxes did not go down during his presidency, they - ummmm MU - 12/20 10:04:45
                                             He didn't cut taxes (nm) - pickle MU - 12/20 09:48:59
     Have you ever heard of the logical fallacy - ummmm MU - 12/20 09:24:44
     TEXAS - Coors4bob MU - 12/20 09:23:53




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard