Except when their nature is verified
Posted on: August 24, 2017 at 19:12:21 CT
FootballRefugee
MU
Posts:
91528
Member For:
22.49 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
by experiment or other observation - then they are rightly known as predictive models. For example, Einstein's hypothesis (at least many parts of it) passed its experimental tests on data outside any test set used to develop it (of course, it's a special case that there wasn't data used to develop it, but that is the actual test of 'predictive models' - data other than that used in the studies to make them). Your climate hilarity ... hasn't. In fact, it has failed miserably on numerous, laughable fronts. Even had data scandals.
Hence, you are demanding people believe a hypothesis which has failed all attempts to show it has any actual predictive capability. It's hilarious you think you can make people think otherwise, or that you are somehow teaching your betters here something about the scientific method.
Cool.
Edited by FootballRefugee at 19:18:16 on 08/24/17