Welcome Guest

If there is a moral responsibility, it's a personal one.

Posted on: June 27, 2017 at 12:32:52 CT
90Tiger STL
Posts:
163759
Member For:
23.39 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
20
Not a governmental, or state-sponsored moral responsibility, no.

Your examples are personal moral responsibility, not state-sponsored, tax (theft) empowered.


Differentiate.

NO, again, the US govt is not morally obligated. That's an endless pit.

Is the US govt morally obligated to feed every human being in the world? To rid 3rd world countries of poverty, despair and disease?

You're cherry-picking a spot on the globe to gloat morality while suffering happens endlessly all over the planet.

Feel good on someone else's nickle.

You feel a moral compulsion? Join a charity and do something about it but STFU about stealing money from your fellow citizens so the US govt can conveniently play good-cop in an area vital to oil and other strategic interests.

jeesh, dude. wake up.

Whe exactly do you think you're fooling here? ME or yourself?
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

     LOL..Yahoo...seriously? (nm) - MUGuy2004 STL - 6/27 10:41:33
          It's not the responsibility of the US govt to protect any - 90Tiger MU - 6/27 11:28:28
               I agree. But is there a moral responsibility to save - hokie VT - 6/27 11:46:48
                    If there is a moral responsibility, it's a personal one. - 90Tiger MU - 6/27 12:32:52
          What are your thoughts on Tamir? - Silas MU - 6/27 10:41:30
               Start a new thread with specifics. We can discuss. nm - hokie VT - 6/27 10:43:59
          ...And Trump has erased the Obama redline - mu7176grad MU - 6/27 10:41:01
          Democrats have murdered more children than anyone - Butcher of Bakersfield STL - 6/27 10:40:26
     WUT??? - mizzoumurfkc MU - 6/27 10:19:07
          what are you talking about?(nm) - tigerNkc MU - 6/27 10:25:20
     Lol, one of your better posts. And to answer the article - TigerMatt STL - 6/27 10:16:16
          The one that was such bull**** that Trump had to obstruct - JG A - 6/27 10:15:29
               Can't obstruct a fake investigation into "mostly bull****." - MUTGR MU - 6/27 10:28:57
                    Why would you try to obstruct a bull**** investigation? - limenats MU - 6/27 10:34:29
                         And he didn't. nm. - MUTGR MU - 6/27 10:36:31
                              LOL - JG A - 6/27 10:49:34
                    But But But it could STILL be true. - TIGERROAR MU - 6/27 10:34:20
          What makes you think there would be special prosecutor - limenats MU - 6/27 10:14:59
               CNN admitted its "mostly bull****." nm. - MUTGR MU - 6/27 10:28:04
                    Benghazi, that was bull****. - limenats MU - 6/27 10:32:56
                         It was certainly a partisan investigation - pickle MU - 6/27 10:48:52
                              What were they guilty of? - limenats MU - 6/27 10:52:16
                                   Mostly of covering their political asses - Mormad MU - 6/27 11:34:50
                                   Well, running guns, operating a black ops staging site - pickle MU - 6/27 11:17:54
                         holy ****. wow.(nm) - tigerNkc MU - 6/27 10:35:35
               Yup - mizzoumurfkc MU - 6/27 10:20:37
                    wow. just wow.(nm) - tigerNkc MU - 6/27 10:30:03
                         Its catchier than "this Mueller's for you" - JG A - 6/27 10:36:02




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard