Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

Lol, one of your better posts. And to answer the article

Posted on: June 27, 2017 at 10:16:16 CT
TigerMatt STL
Posts:
96623
Member For:
26.46 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
3
statement of "did not include any details of how or what the United States knew about the possible attack, nor how confident U.S. officials were that Assad might carry it out."

It is known because it is chemical weapons provided by the US to extremists fighting Assad.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

WH expecting bad investigation news - JG A - 6/27 10:11:24
     LOL..Yahoo...seriously? (nm) - MUGuy2004 STL - 6/27 10:41:33
     Tell the civilians in syria that our very own Silas has the - hokie VT - 6/27 10:27:54
          It's not the responsibility of the US govt to protect any - 90Tiger MU - 6/27 11:28:28
               I agree. But is there a moral responsibility to save - hokie VT - 6/27 11:46:48
                    If there is a moral responsibility, it's a personal one. - 90Tiger MU - 6/27 12:32:52
          What are your thoughts on Tamir? - Silas MU - 6/27 10:41:30
               Start a new thread with specifics. We can discuss. nm - hokie VT - 6/27 10:43:59
          ...And Trump has erased the Obama redline - mu7176grad MU - 6/27 10:41:01
          Democrats have murdered more children than anyone - Butcher of Bakersfield STL - 6/27 10:40:26
     WUT??? - mizzoumurfkc MU - 6/27 10:19:07
          what are you talking about?(nm) - tigerNkc MU - 6/27 10:25:20
     Lol, one of your better posts. And to answer the article - TigerMatt STL - 6/27 10:16:16
     Is that the investigation that is "mostly bull****"? nm. - MUTGR MU - 6/27 10:12:26
          The one that was such bull**** that Trump had to obstruct - JG A - 6/27 10:15:29
               Can't obstruct a fake investigation into "mostly bull****." - MUTGR MU - 6/27 10:28:57
                    Why would you try to obstruct a bull**** investigation? - limenats MU - 6/27 10:34:29
                         And he didn't. nm. - MUTGR MU - 6/27 10:36:31
                              LOL - JG A - 6/27 10:49:34
                    But But But it could STILL be true. - TIGERROAR MU - 6/27 10:34:20
          What makes you think there would be special prosecutor - limenats MU - 6/27 10:14:59
               CNN admitted its "mostly bull****." nm. - MUTGR MU - 6/27 10:28:04
                    Benghazi, that was bull****. - limenats MU - 6/27 10:32:56
                         It was certainly a partisan investigation - pickle MU - 6/27 10:48:52
                              What were they guilty of? - limenats MU - 6/27 10:52:16
                                   Mostly of covering their political asses - Mormad MU - 6/27 11:34:50
                                   Well, running guns, operating a black ops staging site - pickle MU - 6/27 11:17:54
                         holy ****. wow.(nm) - tigerNkc MU - 6/27 10:35:35
               Yup - mizzoumurfkc MU - 6/27 10:20:37
                    wow. just wow.(nm) - tigerNkc MU - 6/27 10:30:03
                         Its catchier than "this Mueller's for you" - JG A - 6/27 10:36:02




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard