I'd consider an argument for Bob Staak
Posted on: June 6, 2017 at 10:55:07 CT
FIJItiger
MU
Posts:
147771
Member For:
22.49 yrs
Level:
Moderator
M.O.B. Votes:
0
He took over a Wake Forest program in 1985 that had gone to 5 straight postseason tournaments, and went 45-69 overall and 8-48 in ACC play over the next four seasons. He resigned amid an NCAA inquiry into recruiting violations. He went 8-21 and winless in the ACC in his first season and never won more than three conference games during his four years at Wake.
But even then he had a reasonably successful 6 year run at Xavier before that showing competence, and was an NBA assistant for 5 different organizations over the next 12 years so he was obviously desired for some skill set after his failure. In my opinion Kim was worse than him in terms of qualifications, on the court production, overall impact, and after the fact desirability. You could make an argument for Staak, but it wouldn't be a very compelling one. Kim is almost certainly the worst.