Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

So the Bush Tax cuts weren't??(nm)

Posted on: May 24, 2017 at 10:29:31 CT
raskolnikov MU
Posts:
188078
Member For:
24.81 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
(nm) means no message
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

What we know works - raskolnikov MU - 5/24 09:50:25
     First of all, what is "supply side trickle down" and when - ummmm MU - 5/24 09:55:38
          You surely do have an opinion - raskolnikov MU - 5/24 10:02:03
               everything you think you know is wrong. Everything (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 5/24 10:20:54
               Not a failed policy... you cannot rewrite facts - Spanky KU - 5/24 10:07:10
                    Nice straw dog in there - raskolnikov MU - 5/24 10:27:39
                         Read the article, Raz. It addresses Supply Side Economics - Spanky KU - 5/24 10:55:31
                         You constantly make that argument (nm) - pickle MU - 5/24 10:36:10
               that wasn't opinion (nm) - pickle MU - 5/24 10:06:18
               There weren't any tax cuts during the W era - ummmm MU - 5/24 10:04:53
                    So the Bush Tax cuts weren't??(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 5/24 10:29:31
                         Isn't your whole misconceived idea of "trickle down" - ummmm MU - 5/24 10:33:58
                         there were no Bush tax cuts (nm) - pickle MU - 5/24 10:32:05




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard