You know Sal, you remind me of a famished little mouse scurrying around for scraps to cling to.
Here is one explanation for what I said about Russian denial. And they have come around, but it was one response. From the Business Insider:
An 'infantile argument': Experts pour cold water on Russia's 'fanciful' explanation for Syrian gas attack
"Russia's government said Wednesday that the toxic gas that killed 83 people and wounded at least 150 in northern Syria the day before was released accidentally when a Syrian air strike hit a "terrorist warehouse" containing "toxic substances."
"According to the objective data of the Russian airspace control, Syrian aviation struck a large terrorist warehouse near Khan Shaykhun that housed a warehouse making bombs, with toxic substances," the Russian defense ministry said in a statement.
"The arsenal of chemical weapons" was destined for fighters in Iraq, the ministry added.
Experts have cast doubt on Russia's explanation for Syria's worst chemical weapons attack since 2013, when Syrian President Bashar Assad — an ally of Russian President Vladimir Putin — is believed to have used sarin gas to kill as many as 1,400 people in the outskirts of Syria's capital, Damascus. Assad still denies responsibility for that attack.
And here is two.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2017/04/05/russia-gas-attack-victims-faked-it.html
They are not believable, but they are out there.