Welcome Guest

That it is.

Posted on: March 20, 2017 at 11:45:48 CT

alwaysright MU

Posts:

52716

Member For:

17.99 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

If he was in year 3 or 4, this is a different discussion. I was not in favor of Martin in 2011 because there were clearly better options. I am not in favor of Martin today (although by a lesser margin) because there are clearly candidates with a higher potential. Good or bad, Martin's stat line is set.

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

We should have hired Cuonzo Martin in 2011. - mizzoudiehard MU - 3/20 07:33:53

Completely wrong. We should have hired Gregg Marshall in - alwaysright MU - 3/20 07:40:02

Cuonzo beat Marshall at the end of that season - BOILERTIGER MU

- 3/20 07:59:52

Yeah. He also lost to Indiana St twice that year. - alwaysright MU - 3/20 08:04:23

Of course not, Martin won the league too - BOILERTIGER MU

- 3/20 08:07:27

Meh. - Evenflow MU - 3/20 08:11:47

That it is. - alwaysright MU - 3/20 11:45:48

I advocated for Marshall as well in 2011 - mizzoudiehard MU - 3/20 07:53:24

Living in Spfd, I watched a lot of Valley ball. It was - alwaysright MU - 3/20 08:01:29

He'll be solid for Mizzou (nm) - Da_Haze KC - 3/20 08:03:48