Just part of Glass-Steagall was changed and it dealt with
Posted on: August 5, 2016 at 15:27:31 CT
Alferd Packer
MU
Posts:
50313
Member For:
26.09 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
prohibition of ownership of commercial banks and investment banks. The two types couldn't be under the same ownership. That was to protect the commercial banks from the higher risk of investment banks. The common ownership restriction was lifted but they still could not blend their business activity. Although the left claims "repealing" Glass-Steagall caused the crash it really had nothing to do with it.
Changes to the Community Reinvestment Act gave regulators power over lenders to restrict their business activity if they didn't meet quotas of high-risk loans to "poor people" in targeted neighborhoods. For example, if a bank applied to open a new branch location, regulators would examine its loan/mortgage portfolio to see if it met the desired level of CRA loans. If not they could deny approval of the new branch. We can go into how this led to derivatives with federal encouragement, Fannie Mae, Freddy Mac, etc but I don't feel like it right now. TMI for a single TB post. Suffice it to say that the result was from Democrat policies to make more homeowners of people that could not in reality afford it.