Welcome Guest

court cases involving the U.S. Constitution have affirmed

Posted on: August 31, 2025 at 19:14:47 CT
JeffB MU
Posts:
73587
Member For:
21.76 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
20
the authority of federal rules to govern elections, primarily through the Elections Clause in Article I, Section 4, which grants Congress the power to regulate the "Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives" and allows it to override state regulations.

The Supreme Court has consistently interpreted this clause to give Congress broad, "paramount" authority to preempt state election laws.

For example, in Arizona v. Inter Tribal Council of Arizona (2013), the Court held that the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 preempted an Arizona law requiring documentary proof of citizenship for voter registration, affirming that federal law can displace state rules in federal elections.

Additionally, in Foster v. Love (1997), the Court struck down a Louisiana law that effectively canceled general elections by declaring primary winners as final, because it conflicted with federal law setting a uniform Election Day.

The Court emphasized that state authority over federal elections exists only until Congress chooses to act, and federal law takes precedence.

This principle reinforces that federal rules can and do govern key aspects of election administration across states.

AI-generated answer. Please verify critical facts.

Voting & Elections Supreme Court Cases
https://supreme.justia.com/cases-by-topic/voting-elections/

Interpretation & Debate
Elections Clause
https://constitutioncenter.org/the-constitution/articles/article-i/clauses/750

U.S. Supreme Court Affirms State Courts’ Role in Election Cases
https://statecourtreport.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/us-supreme-court-affirms-state-courts-role-election-cases

ArtI.S4.C1.3 Congress and the Elections Clause
Article I, Section 4, Clause 1:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/article-1/section-4/clause-1/congress-and-the-elections-clause

ArtI.S4.C1.2 States and the Elections Clause
Article I, Section 4, Clause 1:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/article-1/section-4/clause-1/states-and-the-elections-clause

Trump's EO may be tossed out, but apparently there are instances where the feds can have a say in how elections are carried out.

Edited by JeffB at 19:16:14 on 08/31/25
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

     Election rules are determined by the states - Ferg MU - 8/31 16:47:34
          court cases involving the U.S. Constitution have affirmed - JeffB MU - 8/31 19:14:47
               that's awesome - Ferg MU - 8/31 19:17:34
                    Potentially it is. If the courts have said that some federal - JeffB MU - 8/31 19:29:20
                         yeah, - Ferg MU - 8/31 19:36:29
                              I have no idea how it will play out, but I give Trump a slim - JeffB MU - 8/31 19:40:30
                    It's relevant to the first phrase in your response above: - 90Tiger STL - 8/31 19:18:52
                         no, it's not relevant - Ferg MU - 8/31 19:26:25
                              I don't think the EO will matter at all; I'm simply pointing - 90Tiger STL - 8/31 20:18:43
          I think it's meant to fire up people like you - 90Tiger STL - 8/31 17:53:54
               it doesn't fire me up at all. I know it means nothing - Ferg MU - 8/31 18:00:34
                    Yes, the cult of the nine robes - SwampTiger MU - 8/31 18:05:01
                         This will never make it to SCOTUS (nm) - haeffb MU - 8/31 18:17:49
                              he knows, that's not his point (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 8/31 18:43:36
                    what cult? why do you need to project like this and - 90Tiger STL - 8/31 18:04:38
          What is the voting rights act????...nm - tigertix MU - 8/31 17:40:34
               was the voting rights act an EO? - Ferg MU - 8/31 17:46:22
                    no, but it is unconstitutional, why don't you care? (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 8/31 17:55:55
                    It was unconstitutional(nm) - El-ahrairah BAMA - 8/31 17:53:06
                         the Supreme Court determined it was unconstitional? - Ferg MU - 8/31 17:59:35
                              and SCOTUS has ruled parts of the act unconstitutional, - 90Tiger STL - 8/31 18:05:55
                              Is the Affordable Care Act constitutional? (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 8/31 18:04:59
                                   apparently so - Ferg MU - 8/31 18:08:28
                                        RE: apparently so - 90Tiger STL - 8/31 18:10:33
                                        it's absolutely unconstitutional, ferg. you need to - 90Tiger STL - 8/31 18:10:21
          Your cult needs another Covid crisis nm - pinkman MU - 8/31 17:38:26
          No, it will enrage the dems to come out against it...trap..n - tigertix MU - 8/31 17:18:51
          Federal law can override state laws when necessary to ensure - mu4ever DUKE - 8/31 17:10:22
               an EO is not federal law - Ferg MU - 8/31 17:17:36
          So a state could bring back poll taxes and literacy tests - El-ahrairah BAMA - 8/31 16:50:48
               I know you are a monomental dumb ass - Ferg MU - 8/31 16:59:51
     The intent is good, but the EO isn’t worth the paper he - Spanky KU - 8/31 15:03:49
     I agree with him 100% but don't believe an EO has the - DHighlander NWMSU - 8/31 14:59:50




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard