 |
|
This judge who issued the Planned Parenthood injunction
Posted on: July 8, 2025 at 15:16:46 CT
OntheMark MU
Posts:
4112
Member For:
18.88 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
needs to be censured and disbarred. She had unmitigated gall to say that Planned Parenthood had shown "good cause" for her to intervene.
The only problem is, she had absolutely no right to intervene. But being the typical liberal Obama appointee that she is, she has issued this temporary injunction.
Obviously this libtard either failed Constitutional Law or was asleep the entire time.
“All Bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives; but the Senate may propose or concur with amendments as on other Bills.”
— U.S. Constitution, Article I, section 7, clause 1
“No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law; and a regular Statement and Account of the Receipts and Expenditures of all public Money shall be published from time to time.”
— U.S. Constitution, Article I, section 9, clause 7.
Congress, and in particular the House of Representatives, is thus invested with the “power of the purse,” or the ability to tax and spend public money for the national government. The House passed the bill. It was signed by the President. It is the law. Yet one Federal District Court Judge believes she has the power, not Congress, to decide how Federal money is spent.
I would say this is unbelievable, but it is truly believable given the current state we arr in
The only problem is, she had absolutely no right to intervene. But being the typical liberal Obama appointee that she is, she has issued this temporary injunction.
Obviously this libtard either failed Constitutional Law or was asleep the entire time.
“All Bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives; but the Senate may propose or concur with amendments as on other Bills.”
— U.S. Constitution, Article I, section 7, clause 1
“No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law; and a regular Statement and Account of the Receipts and Expenditures of all public Money shall be published from time to time.”
— U.S. Constitution, Article I, section 9, clause 7.
Congress, and in particular the House of Representatives, is thus invested with the “power of the purse,” or the ability to tax and spend public money for the national government. The House passed the bill. It was signed by the President. It is the law. Yet one Federal District Court Judge believes she has the power, not Congress, to decide how Federal money is spent.
I would say this is unbelievable, but it is truly believable given the current state we arr in
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
This judge who issued the Planned Parenthood injunction - OntheMark MU - 7/8 15:16:46
-