 |
|
Picklemat and his new band of idiots have correctly stated
Posted on: June 23, 2025 at 10:20:15 CT
hokie VT
Posts:
68013
Member For:
9.62 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
that Iran does not have, did not have, and has never had nuclear weapons. So why did we bother them?
That seemed very rude of us, don't you think?
Suppose this… a small, weak, stupid but half crazy and very dangerous person you know has a gun, but no bullets. He is making bullets to use in his weapon, and as every bullet is finished, he says, "I'm going to kill you". He is now stockpiling Bullet after bullet and each time he completes one he says "I am going to kill you".
Now it would be easy for you, maybe not mat or Sara or sea gullible, they're not inclined towards toxic masculinity, you know, but destroying his stockpile of bullets would be fairly easy. No real danger to you or anyone else, just don't let him make the bullets.
And yet according to picklemat, sea gullible, and Sara, we can't, shouldn't and should be condemned for not allowing him to make bullets to load into his gun and kill us.
Why, property rights?
Or did someone call the crazy guy a poopy head 90 years ago in a café in Philadelphia, so crazy guy can do whatever he wants and it's our fault.
Or something.
Picklemat, Sara and sea gullible want our enemies to be as strong as possible. They want the people who have pledged to kill us to have the ability as well as the right to kill us at their discretion.
Stopping them from doing so is just rude.
I guess.
Edited by hokie at 10:30:09 on 06/23/25
That seemed very rude of us, don't you think?
Suppose this… a small, weak, stupid but half crazy and very dangerous person you know has a gun, but no bullets. He is making bullets to use in his weapon, and as every bullet is finished, he says, "I'm going to kill you". He is now stockpiling Bullet after bullet and each time he completes one he says "I am going to kill you".
Now it would be easy for you, maybe not mat or Sara or sea gullible, they're not inclined towards toxic masculinity, you know, but destroying his stockpile of bullets would be fairly easy. No real danger to you or anyone else, just don't let him make the bullets.
And yet according to picklemat, sea gullible, and Sara, we can't, shouldn't and should be condemned for not allowing him to make bullets to load into his gun and kill us.
Why, property rights?
Or did someone call the crazy guy a poopy head 90 years ago in a café in Philadelphia, so crazy guy can do whatever he wants and it's our fault.
Or something.
Picklemat, Sara and sea gullible want our enemies to be as strong as possible. They want the people who have pledged to kill us to have the ability as well as the right to kill us at their discretion.
Stopping them from doing so is just rude.
I guess.
Edited by hokie at 10:30:09 on 06/23/25
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
Picklemat and his new band of idiots have correctly stated - hokie VT - 6/23 10:20:15