I'll respond as simply as I can, since you're struggling.
Posted on: June 22, 2025 at 17:14:40 CT
sks MU
Posts:
829
Member For:
10.3 months
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
You pose those like they are mutually exclusive (hoping you know what that means). They are not. First, there is no evidence they had nuclear weapons. Second, they is no evidence yet that the attack degraded their stock of uranium (however refined it was). Third, there is no evidence at all that we are safer today than we were yesterday. In the short term, our interests in the middle east are likely less safe. So in short, I would like neither of those choices, and thats what we had a few days ago. Let me know if you need any terms explained.