 |
|
People aren't generally going to dig into assertions that th
Posted on: June 19, 2025 at 22:48:35 CT
JeffB MU
Posts:
72698
Member For:
21.56 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
they already agree with.
But if someone gave opinions that I disagreed with, I would be first inclined to examine the reasons & logic behind them and discuss why I might disagree with the opinions. If they are based on factual assertions that seem questionable to me I might double check the questionable facts.
You skip all of those steps. In this case the facts seem pretty straightforward and you don't challenge them at all. You don't break down any logical assertions the author made in order to point out any possible errors or omissions that he might have made... instead, you throw out demands to want to know the person's name as if that is some sort of valid contestation of the facts or opinions given in the article.
It is pathetically lazy at best, deceitful at worst.
But if someone gave opinions that I disagreed with, I would be first inclined to examine the reasons & logic behind them and discuss why I might disagree with the opinions. If they are based on factual assertions that seem questionable to me I might double check the questionable facts.
You skip all of those steps. In this case the facts seem pretty straightforward and you don't challenge them at all. You don't break down any logical assertions the author made in order to point out any possible errors or omissions that he might have made... instead, you throw out demands to want to know the person's name as if that is some sort of valid contestation of the facts or opinions given in the article.
It is pathetically lazy at best, deceitful at worst.
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
People aren't generally going to dig into assertions that th - JeffB MU - 6/19 22:48:35