Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

RE: Yeah, but you don't rough up someone just for asking

Posted on: June 17, 2025 at 23:59:42 CT
THEGROVE68 MU
Posts:
5618
Member For:
18.15 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
But if you can rough them up why not do so if they are impeding the expediated arrest? Doing so is a deterrent for the next knuckle head. Fear should be the norm in these situations....
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Imagine being a comptroller and thinking you have the - Bosalphus KC - 6/17 16:41:36
     Running for NYC mayor and needed to do something - Spanky KU - 6/17 18:04:02
     I'm not letting go....should have decked the commie...nm - tigertix MU - 6/17 17:48:03
     Asking to see a warrant isn't interference nm - SparkyStalcup MU - 6/17 16:56:38
          ICE does not need a judicial warrant to arrest a wetback. - BH O'bonga MU - 6/17 18:31:46
          actually, it is, and moreover, locking arms with the - 90Tiger STL - 6/17 17:27:20
               No, it isn't. None of the obstruction acts mention that - SparkyStalcup MU - 6/17 18:05:26
                    he didn't "simply ask for a warrant" and he had no - 90Tiger STL - 6/17 19:28:26
                    He was holding onto the Illegal in a dumb attempt to - Spanky KU - 6/17 18:43:14
          Linking arms with the suspect to prevent arrest is (nm) - Bosalphus KC - 6/17 16:57:30
               Not if a warrant wasn't produced. Nm - SparkyStalcup MU - 6/17 16:59:30
                    He is not the man's lawyer and had zero right to - Spanky KU - 6/17 18:05:07
                         He has every right to ask for it. Demanding it and asking - SparkyStalcup MU - 6/17 18:10:54
                              and ice was under no obligation to show him - and then - 90Tiger STL - 6/17 19:29:14
                    sparky - 90Tiger STL - 6/17 17:25:17
                         RE: sparky: The Act prohibits judicial review and no warrant - BH O'bonga MU - 6/17 18:59:27
                         Yeah, but you don't rough up someone just for asking - SparkyStalcup MU - 6/17 17:56:19
                              RE: Yeah, but you don't rough up someone just for asking - THEGROVE68 MU - 6/17 23:59:42
                              He was interfering with an arrest - Spanky KU - 6/17 18:07:56
                                   A likely illegal arrest. Nm - SparkyStalcup MU - 6/17 18:09:14
                              they didn't rough him up for asking for a warrant. He - 90Tiger STL - 6/17 18:00:05
                                   Handcuffing a guy is roughing him up - SparkyStalcup MU - 6/17 18:08:56
                                        RE: Handcuffing a guy is roughing him up - THEGROVE68 MU - 6/18 00:01:44
                                        he got handcuffed for not obeying lawful orders and - 90Tiger STL - 6/17 19:29:52
                                             Unlawful orders from illegitimate actors nm - SparkyStalcup MU - 6/17 23:25:52
                                                  RE: Unlawful orders from illegitimate actors nm - THEGROVE68 MU - 6/18 00:06:07
                                             Dishonest - Wildcat KSU - 6/17 22:45:35
                              Sure you do - Wildcat KSU - 6/17 17:59:15
                                   Im sure that's ok with you. Most civil rights lawyers - SparkyStalcup MU - 6/17 18:12:37
                                        They didn't arrest him for asking a question - Wildcat KSU - 6/17 18:21:21
                    lmfao (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 6/17 17:10:53
                    It’s interference regardless (nm) - Bosalphus KC - 6/17 17:03:28
     Depends? If the comptroller is also a public notary then - TigerMatt STL - 6/17 16:46:57
          LOL(nm) - Wildcat KSU - 6/17 17:59:40
          do you coach youth football? (nm) - SwampTiger MU - 6/17 17:39:09
          To ask for a warrant that isn’t even needed? (nm) - Bosalphus KC - 6/17 16:52:24
               Warrant is needed. No exigent circumstances exist nm - SparkyStalcup MU - 6/17 16:57:29
                    the ice warrant is always required and immigration officers - 90Tiger STL - 6/17 17:26:30
                         The ICE officers are the ones posing for TV. In masks. They - SparkyStalcup MU - 6/17 17:58:21
                              and there's this - 90Tiger STL - 6/17 18:05:08
                                   And Trump is underwater 20 points in favorability - SparkyStalcup MU - 6/17 18:15:31
                                        why do i care that trump is down 20 pts in favorability? (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 6/17 19:30:17
                              "posing for cameras" "in masks" makes no sense. There - 90Tiger STL - 6/17 18:01:34
                    You're just another dem mad their slave labor - AWOLTiger KC - 6/17 17:04:33
                    ICE doesn’t need a judicial warrant - Bosalphus KC - 6/17 17:03:12




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard