Welcome Guest

I’m not. The law is pretty clear. Legally this isn’t

Posted on: June 12, 2025 at 21:38:14 CT

TigerMatt STL

Posts:

96681

Member For:

26.46 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

a rebellion, because that requires a coordinated and armed effort to overthrow the government, not a single issue protest.

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

Fed court says return CA national guard to Newsom. - TigerMatt STL - 6/12 20:22:19

Lincoln had to do it too(nm) - CulturedDan MU

- 6/12 20:36:21

Have you read Differ We Must by Steve Inskeep since you - KCT-BoneTiger A - 6/12 21:45:51

Let it burn. Start with Hollywood and Beverly Hills. - Tigrrrr! MU

- 6/12 20:34:11

I'm less than impressed with the reasoning offered - 90Tiger STL - 6/12 20:33:12

Naturally, to your America hating ilk, the Constitution - JG A - 6/12 20:36:17

relax, nutjob (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 6/12 20:40:07

He hasn’t said that at all.(nm) - TigerMatt STL - 6/12 20:39:00

It doesn’t matter. The law says the orders go through the - TigerMatt STL - 6/12 20:34:04

what does 'through the governor" mean, exactly? if - 90Tiger STL - 6/12 20:40:53

No, it’s called the Insurrection Act. The Commander-In- - TigerMatt STL - 6/12 21:14:52

Yes. (nm) - TigerMatt STL - 6/12 21:41:15

was this in the judges ruling today, Matt? (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 6/12 21:26:27

Yes. Title 10 was violated anyway because the orders were - TigerMatt STL - 6/12 21:46:47

I thought one judge already ruled against that? (nm) - Bosalphus KC - 6/12 20:31:46

Just another ruling that will be overturned. The Ninth - DHighlander NWMSU - 6/12 20:30:41

Doubtful. The law is clear orders go through the governor of - TigerMatt STL - 6/12 20:33:07

Like they were in the civil rights era when the guard was - DHighlander NWMSU - 6/12 20:42:40

Were those actions challenged in a federal court? Did - TigerMatt STL - 6/12 20:47:36

No and no, but that's beside the point. Your position is - 90Tiger STL - 6/12 20:52:35

Title 32 a governor can tell a President to F off. The only - TigerMatt STL - 6/12 20:57:15

RE: Title 32 a governor can tell a President to F off. The only - 90Tiger STL - 6/12 20:58:48

It's not like this order will stand - DHighlander NWMSU - 6/12 20:50:45

It will. You don’t know the law. (nm) - TigerMatt STL - 6/12 20:57:44

that was a more currently palatable directive, I - 90Tiger STL - 6/12 20:46:13

"orders go through" has a whole lot of implications - 90Tiger STL - 6/12 20:33:55

The implication is the governor has to pass on the orders. - TigerMatt STL - 6/12 20:38:27

So governors have veto power over the commander in chief? - DHighlander NWMSU - 6/12 20:44:11

Yes. Title 32. The President needs to use the Insurrection - TigerMatt STL - 6/12 20:54:59

did today's decision lean on Title 32 or did you bring that - 90Tiger STL - 6/12 20:56:40

Trump claims authority with Title 10. He can’t. He needs - TigerMatt STL - 6/12 20:58:35

is that what was in the ruling today? that's not what I - 90Tiger STL - 6/12 20:59:15

The court ruling today was that what is happening in - TigerMatt STL - 6/12 21:23:12

Matt, you're off the reservation (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 6/12 21:26:50

I’m not. The law is pretty clear. Legally this isn’t - TigerMatt STL - 6/12 21:38:14

RE: I’m not. The law is pretty clear. Legally this isn’t - hangman MU - 6/13 05:50:19

I understand your interpretation (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 6/12 20:39:45